跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04153474
NCT04153474Unknown不适用

Exit Strategy After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Large or Small Bore Tube? Randomised Controlled Trial

Mansoura University2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 220 人开始时间: 2019年5月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
220
试验地点
2
主要终点
Rate of hemoglobin reduction difference between groups

研究概览

简要总结

Regarding to the distribution of nephrostomy tube (NT) size usage by country. There was a clear distinction between countries that used solely the small bore (SB) NT (Chile and Australia) and those that used solely the large bore (LB) NT (Czech Republic and Japan). There is also a trend toward SB NT in North America (~75% in USA and Canada) and toward LB NT in South America (~80% in Argentina and Mexico). In Europe the trend is equal (~50% in Germany, France, Greece and UK). Based on previous data and in view of conflicting data about postoperative complication including extravasation, bleeding and hemoglobin change and pain between previous studies, we will conduct this randomised trial comparing SB and LB NT following PNL.

Our aim to evaluate the safety of small versus large bore NT reporting complications using the Clavien-Dindo system with categorisation of PNL-specific complications

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Staghorn calculi
  • Renal pelvis stones =>2 cm
  • Lower pole stones= >1.5 cm
  • upper ureteral calculi =>1.5 cm
  • SWL-resistant stones

排除标准

  • Age <18 years or Pregnancy
  • Tubeless PNL
  • Need for 3 percutaneous tracts intraoperative
  • Morbid obesity (BMI >40)
  • Refuse to complete study requirements
  • Tumour in the presumptive access tract area or Potential malignant kidney tumour

结局指标

主要结局

Rate of hemoglobin reduction difference between groups

时间窗: 8 months

measured in gram/liter

次要结局

  • postoperative pain score(8 months)
  • postoperative patient satisfaction(8 months)
  • overall postoperative complication(8 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Ahmed Shoma

Principal Investigator

Mansoura University

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

已完成
不适用
Percutaneous Nephrostomy versus Emergency Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy of Sepsis Associated with Uretero-Pelvic Junctional Stone Impaction: A Randomized Controlled Trialsepsis associated with uretero-pelvic junctional stone impactionInfection - Other infectious diseasesRenal and Urogenital - Kidney disease
ACTRN12611000600943Chung Jing Wang45
撤回
不适用
Trial of Efficacy of the RetroPerc DeviceKidney Stone
NCT05022537The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston50
招募中
不适用
International REgistry of COnservative or Radical Treatment of Localized Kidney TumorsKidney Cancer
NCT05363657Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi10,000
已完成
不适用
Effectiveness of Drainage by PCN vs. JJ in Patients With Symptoms of Obstructive Kidney Disease Caused by UrolithiasisUrologic DiseasesUrinary CalculiUrinary ObstructionUrinary StoneUreteric ObstructionCalculus UreteralStone UreterStone, KidneyStone, UrinaryObstruction UreterObstructionUreter CalculiUreter ObstructionKidney DiseasesKidney CalculiKidney Failure, AcuteKidney DysfunctionKidney InsufficiencyPyelonephritis AcutePyelonephritis ObstructivePyelonephrosisHydronephrosis, InfectedHydronephrosis, SecondaryCalculus PyelonephritisObstruction PyelonephritisInfection HydronephrosisHydronephrosisObstruction, Ureter HydronephrosisUrolithiasisRenal StonePyelonephritisObstruction, Renal Calculus HydronephrosisRenal Pelvis Obstruction
NCT04594161Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)204
已完成
不适用
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave LithotripsyKidney Stones
NCT00873054CAMC Health System32
Exit Strategy After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy:... | 临床试验