A Randomized Comparative Clinical Study On Efficacy Of Visaghna - Mahakasaya-Ghanavati And Haridrakhanda In Sitapitta In The Purview Cikitsaya Visaghnyaiva Sa Samam Labhate Narah
试验速览
- 阶段
- 2 期
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 50
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- 1
研究概览
简要总结
INTRODUCTION:
Ayurveda is an ancient system of medicine having eternal principles which are equally applicable even in current period. Although newer and newer diseases are being observed in the society due to drastically changed environmental factors, food and behavioural regimens, Ayurveda with its firm principles can deal with these new diseases using the system of diagnosis and treatment for anukta vyadhi mentioned in classical texts. Sitapitta is one of such diseases which is not mentioned in brhattrayi texts, but laghutrayi texts tried to explore its details as probably it may observed as separate disease in later time. Sitapitta is the tridosaja vyadhi in which as a result of exposure to cold air, kapha and vata dosa gets provoked and spread over the skin and internal body along with pitta[1] casing the sotha resembling with varati dasta sotha, excessive kandu, toda, cchardi, jwara and vidaha. Madhava and later authors opined that Sitapitta occurs due to vata predominant condition.[2]
Hetu, linga and ausadha are mentioned as triskandha of Ayurveda presenting three aspects applicable to entire concepts mentioned therein[3]. Application of the principle of one disease in another disease, can be thought in these three aspects. Sitapitta which is having causative factor as cold air exposure, can be treated with the principle of abhisangaja jwara wherein the disease is said to be occurred due to visa-vriksa-anila-sparsa i.e exposure to the air blowing through poisonous tree[4]. In current scenario, the air pollution causing due to continuous addition of poisonous air particles by the industrial set ups, is big issue at least in the metro cities. Exposure to such air can also be considered under the concept mentioned in abhisangaja jwara. On the basis of partially similar hetu i.e. exposure to air, principle of abhisangaja jwara can be utilized in treating Sitapitta. Abhisangaja jwara which is caused due to vata-pitta samsarga as per the *abhisangajah punarva**ta-pittabhyam[5]*and Sitapitta which is caused due to vata-pitta as per the quotations vatadhikam Sitapitta and pittena saha sambhuya, can be kept under same umbrella of hetu due to similar samavayi karana (vata-pitta) and nimitta karana (anila samsparsa). The principle of abhisangaja jwara ‘cikitsaya visaghnyaiva sa samam labhate narah’ having advice of usage of visaghna treatment can be applied to Sitapitta.
Bhesaja catuska of caraka-samhita encloses mahakasaya having wide clinical application. Visaghna mahakasayawhich consists of 10 drugs can be chosen as best choice for visaghna treatment due to its wide application Hence hypothesis is presented on the basis of these concepts in which principle of jvara is thought to be well applicable in Sitapitta.
The disease Sitapitta is often co related with a condition called Urticaria. Urticaria is an allergic reaction of the skin to a variety of exogenous and endogenous antigens. It is a common disease nowadays, characterized by pale red rashes and severe itching caused by an allergic reaction. Vascular dilatation, the resultant dermal oedema and pruritus are due to the releases of histamine and other mediators from mast cells. Although, any disease mentioned in Ayurveda cannot be completely compared in all aspects with the parallel modern disease, for the purpose to statistical analysis on the basis of objective parameters, the pathological investigations like IgE, DLC, ESR, are planned to be incorporated in the study.
Need of study:
Sitapitta is commonly observed heath problem among society. When the modern counterpart of Sitapitta i.e. urticaria, is compared for knowing the prevalence of the disease, it is observed that approximately 15 to 20% of the general population are found to get suffered from urticaria at least once during their lifetime. Although persons of any age may experience urticaria and/or angioedema. This disease occurs most frequently after adolescence, with the highest incidence in young adults. The exact incidence and prevalence of chronic condition of this disease are not known, although it occurs in at least 0.1% and possibly up to 3% of the population.[6] Though the disease is not life threatening, it makes patient worried, due to its appearance and severe pruritus. The modern medicine provides temporary symptomatic relief and patient has to take medicines for long time, which may be having some unwanted side effects. So a complete relief from the condition without its recurrence is still a question which could be sought out by Ayurveda.
When classical texts of Ayurveda are reviewed, Sitapitta is not mentioned in brhata trayi. so it is important to find the applicability of the principles of brhata trayi in diseases mentioned in other text books also.
Since the role of polluted air and other poisonous articles in this condition the use of *Visaghna mahakasaya Ghanavati[7]*should be better understood with respect to Sitapitta .
Haridrakhanda is the medicine of choice in current practice as treatment of Sitapitta . Since it involves sugar content it is not that much suitable for the patients who are having condition of Diabetes mellitus. Since Visaghna mahakasaya Ghanavati do not possess that much of sugar content it can be safely given to patients of Sitapitta who are also having an association of diabetes.
No study is yet carried out in showing the results of visaghna mahakasaya in Sitapitta. Considering all above points the current study is highly needed.
Research question:
Is there any difference between the efficacy of Visaghna - mahakasaya Ghanavati and Haridrakhanda in the context of the principle of Cikitsaya Visaghnyaiva sa samam labhate narah in the management of Sitapitta ?
Hypothesis:
Null hypothesis
There is no difference between the efficacy ofVisaghna -mahakasaya -ghanavati and Haridrakhanda in the management of Sitapittain the context of the principle of ‘Cikitsaya Visaghnyaiva sa samam labhate narah
Alternate hypothesis
There is a difference between the efficacy of Visaghna - mahakasaya -Ghanavati and Haridrakhand in the management of Sitapittain the context of the principle of ‘Cikitsaya Visaghnyaiva sa samam labhate narah
Aim
To study and compare the efficacy of Visaghna - mahakasaya -Ghanavati and Haridrakhandin patients of Sitapittain the context of the principle of Cikitsaya Visaghnyaiva sa samam labhate narah
Objectives:
To evaluate the effect of Visaghna - mahakasaya -Ghanavati in the management of Sitapitta .
To compare the efficacy of Visaghna - mahakasaya -Ghanavati and Haridrakhand in the management of Sitapitta
1) MATERIAL AND METHODS:
Literary references related to the study will be collected from the texts of Carakasamhita, Madhava Nidana, Cakradatta, Bhavaprakasa, Bhaisajyaratnavali, and Yogaratnakara their commentaries. Relevant modern literature, research journals and online sources will be accordingly referred and analysed.
A) Selection of cases-
Population- patients of Sitapitta visiting NIA (OPD & IPD)
Sample size –50 ( 25 each group)
Diagnostic Criteria – Sign and symptoms of Sitapittaas per classical texts.
Inclusion Criteria
Patients between the age group 18-60 years of age
Patients of either gender
The patients having classical signs and symptoms of Sitapitta .
Patients willing to participate in the clinical trial
Exclusion Criteria**-**
Patient with long term history of steroid and cytotoxic treatment
Pregnant and lactating women
Patients having concomitant illness like uncontrolled Hypertension, uncontrolled Diabetes mellitus, HIV, Malignancy, etc.
Anaphylaxis, Angioedema of the lips, tongue or larynx etc.
Withdrawal criteria:
The participant who develops any serious condition or any serious adverse effect (Necessitating hospitalization). Patient wants to withdraw from the clinical trial due to any reason
Selection of drug;-
Trial drugs:- Visaghna - mahakasaya [8]- Ghanavati
| No |
Ingredients
Botanical name
Used part
Quantity
|1.
Haridra
Curcuma longa Linn*.*
Kanda
1 part
|2.
Manjistha
Rubia cordifolia Linn*.*
Mool
1 part
|3.
Rasna
Pluchea lanceolata C.B Clarke
Patra
1 part
|4.
Shukshaila (Ela)
Elettaria cardamom Maton
Beej
1 part
|5.
Palindi(kri shnasariva)
Cryptolepis buchanana Roem & Schult
Mool
1 part
|6.
Candana(ra ktacandan)
Pterocarpus santalinus Linn.
Kandsaar
1 part
|7.
Kataka
Strychnos potatorum Linn*.*
Beej
1 part
|8.
Sirisa
Albizzia lebbeck Benth
Twak,Beej,P atra,Pushpa
1 part
|9.
Sindhuvara
Vitex negundo Linn
Patra,Mool, Beej
1 part
|10.
Slesmataka
Cordia dichotoma Forst. F.
Phala
1 part
Compare drug: -Haridrakhanda[9]:
| NO |
NAME
BOTANICAL NAME
USEFUL PART
QUANTITY
|1.
Haridra
Curcuma longa Linn
Kanda
1 kudava
|2.
Trivrta
Operculina turpethum Linn
Moola twak
4 pala
|3.
Abhaya
Terminalia chebula Retz
Phala
4 pala
|4
Sita
Sa ardha prastha dwayam
|5.
Darvi
Berberis aristate DC
Moola, Kanda,Phala
1 Kola
|6.
Musta
Cyperus rotundus Linn
Kanda
1Kola
|7.
Ajavaina
Trachyspermum ammi Linn
Phala
1Kola
|8.
Ajamoda
Carum roxburghianum DC Craib
Phala
1Kola
|9.
Citraka
Plumbago zylenica Linn
Moola twak
1Kola
|10
Katu rohini
Piccorhiza kurroa Royle ex Benth
Moola
1Kola
|11
Ajaji(jirak)
Cuminum cyminum Linn
Beeja
1Kola
|12
Pippali
Piper longum Linn
Phala
1Kola
|13
Sunthi
Zingiber officinale Rosc
Kanda
1 Kola
|14
Dalacini
Cinnamomnm zeylanicum Breyn
Twaka
1 kola
|15
Tejapatra
Cinnamomnm tamala Nees & Eberm
Patra
1 kola
|16
Ela
Elettari acardamomum Maton
Beej
1 kola
|17
Vidanga
Embelia ribes Burm
Phal
1 kola
|18
Amrta
Tinospora cardifolia Willd
Kanda
1 kola
|19
Vasa
Adhatoda vasica Nees
Patra,Pushpa,Moola
1 kola
|20
Kustha
Saussurea lappa C.B Clarke
Moola
1 kola
|21
Amalaki
Emblica officinalis Gaertn
Phala
1kola
|22
Haritaki
Terminalia chebula Retz
Phala
1 kola
|23
Vibhitaki
Terminalia bellirica Roxb.
Phala
1 kola
|24
Cavya
Piper retrofractum Vahl
Phala,Moola
1 kola
|25
Dhanyaka
Coriandrum sativum Linn
Phala
1 kola
|26
Mrutta lauha
Bhasma
1kola
|27
Mrutta abhra
Bhasma
1kola
Prepaeration of drug
The trial drugs will be prepared in GMP certified NIA pharmacy Jaipur, by classical methods.
***Visaghna
- mahakasaya -Ghanavati:-***
The kvatha of Visaghna - mahakasaya drugs with 16 parts of water will be prepared. Then it will be heated till the formation of Ghana and after that vati will be prepared.
METHODOLOGY
Type of study – Comparative Randomized Clinical Trial (open, randomized, comparative, prospective)
Intervention- Patients of Sitapitta –divided into two groups
GROUP A- 25 Patients *Haridrakhand -*6 gm (divided dose) twice a day for 30 days. ,Anupana lukewarmwater[10], Morning and Evening upto half an hour after completion of food (adhobhakta)
GROUP B- 25 Patients*- Visaghna - mahakasaya -Ghanavati* 4 gm (divided dose) twice a day for 30 days. Anupana-water[11],Morning and Evening upto half an hour after completion of food(adhobhakta)
Follow up- every 15 days. Assessment of patients based on criteria will be done before and after the trial period
Assesment criteria:
All the patients will be assessed for relief in classical signs and symptoms and objective parameters after the completion of trial. To give objectivity to subjective classical signs and symptoms grading/scoring system will be adopted which is as follows-
Subjective parameters :
Varati Damsta samsthana Sotha
Kandu Bahula
Toda Bahula
Chardi
Jvara
Vidaha
Scoring criteria:
Urticaria Activity Score[12]
| Sr. no. |
Wheals or hives
Grade
|1
None
0
|2
Mild (<20
wheals/24h)
1
|3
Moderate (21-50 wheals/24h)
2
|4
Intense or severe (>50 wheals/24h or large confluent areas of wheals)
3
Severity of itching
| Sr.no |
Itching
Grade
|1
No Itching
0
|2
Mild/Occasional itching
1
|3
Moderate frequent itching
2
|4
Severe frequent itching
3
|5
Very severe itching, which disturb sleep and other routine activity
4
| URTICARIA CONTROL TEST[13] 1. | |||||
| How much have you suffered from the physical symptom of the urticarial(itch, | |||||
| hives(welts), and swelling) in the last four weeks? |
|Very much 0
Much 1
Somewhat 2
A little 3
Not at all 4
|2. How much was your quality of life affected by the urticaria in the last four weeks?
|Very much 0
Much 1
Somewhat 2
A little 3
Not at all 4
|3. How often was the treatment for your urticaria in the last four weeks not enough to control your urticaria symptoms?
|Very often 0
Often 1
Sometimes 2
Seldom 3
Not at all 4
|4. Overall how well have you had your urticarial under control in the last four weeks?
|Not at all 0
A little 1
Somewhat 2
Well 3
Very well 4
|TOTAL SCORE:
A score of 16 indicates complete disease control . A score of < 12 on the UCT identifies patients with poorly controlled chronic urticaria (CU) , and a score of > 12 identifies those with well-controlled symptoms. An improvement in 3 points is a minimal response , and an improvement of > 6 points is a marked response.
AYURVEDA SCORING PATTERN
Varati Damsta samsthana Sotha(Mandalotpatti) [14]
| Parameters |
Score
|Not present
0
|Up to 25% skin involvement
1
|25-50% skin involvement
2
|51-75% skin involvement
3
|More than 75% skin involvement
4
Kandu
| Parameters |
Score
|No
0
|Mild
1
|Moderate
2
|Severe
3
|Unbearable and disturbing routine
4
Toda :
| Parameters |
Score
|No
0
|Mild
1
|Moderate
2
|Severe
3
|Unbearable and disturbing routine
4
Associated symptoms like chardi, jvara, vidaha,
| Parameters |
Score
|No
0
|Mild
1
|Moderate
2
|Severe
3
|Unbearable
4
Frequency of attack
| Parameters |
Score
|No
0
|Once in 4-5 days
1
|Once in alternate day
2
|Once in daily
3
|Twice daily
4
Objective:
IgE, DLC, ESR
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Subjective parameters
Wilcoxon’s paired rank test
Mann whitney U test
Objective parameters
Paired ‘t’ test
Unpaired ‘t’ test
**2)**OUTCOMES-
Primary Outcome-Change in classical symptoms of sheetpitta such as Varati damsta samsthana sotha, Kandu bahula, Toda bahula, Chardi, Jvara, Vidaha
Secondary Outcome-Change in IgE, DLC ,ESR
PROPOSED CONTENT OF DISSERTATION
The work will be presented in the form of a thesis with following contents-
Benediction
Acknowledgement
Introduction
Review of literature
I. Ayurveda review of Sitapitta
II. Modern review of Urticaria
III. Drug review
Clinical Study
Observations and results
Discussion and summary
Conclusion
Bibliography
Appendix
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Carakasamhita with Ayurvedadipika commentary, edited by Vd. J yadavji
Trikamji acarya Published by Chaukhambha Surbharti prakashan, Varanasi, Reprient edition 2019. cha chi. 3/117
Carakasamhita with Ayurvedadipika commentary, edited by Vd. J yadavji
Trikamji acarya Published by Chaukhambha Surbharti prakashan, Varanasi, Reprient edition 2019. cha chi. 3/118
Carakasamhita with Ayurvedadipika commentary, edited by Vd. J yadavji
Trikamji acarya Published by Chaukhambha Surbharti prakashan, Varanasi, Reprient edition 2019. cha sutra. 4/ 11
Carakasamhita with Ayurvedadipika commentary, edited by Vd. J yadavji
Trikamji acarya Published by Chaukhambha Surbharti prakashan, Varanasi, Reprient edition 2019 cha ni 1/30
Sri Madhavkara, Madhav Nidana Vol 2, Sitapitta udardakothnidanam, 50/1, Vidyotini hindi commentary by Sudarshan Shastri, Chaukhambha Prakashan, Varanasi, 2014;
Sri Madhavkara, Madhav Nidana Vol 2, Sitapitta udardakothnidanam, 50/3-5, Vidyotini hindi commentary by Sudarshan Shastri, Chaukhambha Prakashan, Varanasi, 2014;
Bhaishajyaratnavali of GovindaDasji, Sitapittaudardakota cikitsa 55/18-22, Varanasi, Chaukhamba Sanskrit Sansthan, Volume 3, Print 2009
Davidson S (2006).Davidsons principles and practice of medicine 20th edition, USA Elseviers Health Science.
Ahmad W. Bilal, Ahmad S Mir (201) Research Methodology And Medical Statics for Ayurveda Scholar, Jaipur Ayurved Sanskrit Hindi Pustak Bhandar.
DravyagunaVijnana vol-2edition 2020 by PV Sharma
API Part I Volume 1,2,3,4,5,6
[1] Madhav Nidan 50/1
[2] Madhav Nidan 50/3-4
[3] Charak sutra 1/24
[4] Charak Chi. 3/117
[5] Charak nidan 1/30
[6] Diagnosis and management of urticaria in Indian settings: Skin allergy research society’s guideline-2022 Godse K, Patil A, De A, Sharma N, Rajagopalan M, Shah B, Tahiliani S, Girdhar M, Zawar V, Sangolli P, Shankar DK, Dhar S - Indian J Dermatol (e-ijd.org)
[7] Charak Sutra 4/11
[8] Charak Sutra 4/11
[9] Bhaishajya ratnavali 55/18-22
[10] Bhaishajya ratnavali 55/18-22
[11] API
[12] Evaluation of efficacy of Navakarshik Kwath Ghan in Sheetpitta with special reference to Urticaria Rohan Rathod
[13] Reproduced from Weller K, Groffik A, Church MK, et al. Development and validation of the Urticaria Control Test: A patient reported outcome instrument for assessing chronic urticaria. J Allergy clin Immunol 2014;133:1365
[14] A Comparative Clinical Study To Evaluate The Efficacy Of Durva-Haridra Lepa And Amritadi Syrup In Sheetpitta With Special Reference To Urticaria In Children Dr. Abhishek Ghai
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Coin toss, Lottery, toss of dice, shuffling cards etc
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 60.00 Year(s)(—)
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Patients between the age group 18-60 years of age Patients of either gender The patients having classical signs and symptoms of Sitapitta Patients willing to participate in the clinical trial.
排除标准
- •Patient with long term history of steroid and cytotoxic treatment Pregnant and lactating women Patients having concomitant illness like uncontrolled Hypertension uncontrolled Diabetes mellitus HIV Malignancy etc Anaphylaxis Angioedema of the lips tongue or larynx etc.
结局指标
主要结局
1
TOTAL SCORE:
16
时间窗: Ela
Wheals or hives
时间窗: 30days
Primary Outcome
时间窗: 30days
Change in classical symptoms of sheetpitta such as
时间窗: 30days
Itching
时间窗: 30days
Prickling sensation
时间窗: 30days
Nausea or vomitting
时间窗: 30days
Fever
时间窗: 30days
Burning sensation
时间窗: 30days
1.
时间窗: Haridra
2.
时间窗: Manjistha
3.
时间窗: Rasna
4.
时间窗: Shukshaila (Ela)
5.
时间窗: Palindi(kri shnasariva)
6.
时间窗: Candana(ra ktacandan)
7.
时间窗: Kataka
8.
时间窗: Sirisa
9.
时间窗: Sindhuvara
10.
时间窗: Slesmataka
2.
时间窗: Trivrta
3.
时间窗: Abhaya
4
时间窗: Sita
5.
时间窗: Darvi
6.
时间窗: Musta
7.
时间窗: Ajavaina
8.
时间窗: Ajamoda
9.
时间窗: Citraka
10
时间窗: Katu rohini
11
时间窗: Ajaji(jirak)
12
时间窗: Pippali
13
时间窗: Sunthi
14
时间窗: Dalacini
15
时间窗: Tejapatra
17
时间窗: Vidanga
18
时间窗: Amrta
19
时间窗: Vasa
20
时间窗: Kustha
21
时间窗: Amalaki
22
时间窗: Haritaki
23
时间窗: Vibhitaki
24
时间窗: Cavya
25
时间窗: Dhanyaka
26
时间窗: Mrutta lauha
27
时间窗: Mrutta abhra
1
时间窗: None
2
时间窗: Mild (<20 wheals/24h)
3
时间窗: Moderate (21-50 wheals/24h)
4
时间窗: Intense or severe (>50 wheals/24h or large confluent areas of wheals)
1
时间窗: No Itching
2
时间窗: Mild/Occasional itching
3
时间窗: Moderate frequent itching
4
时间窗: Severe frequent itching
5
时间窗: Very severe itching, which disturb sleep and other routine activity
Very much 0
时间窗: Much 1
2. How much was your quality of life affected by the urticaria in the last four weeks?
Very much 0
时间窗: Much 1
3. How often was the treatment for your urticaria in the last four weeks not enough to control your urticaria symptoms?
Very often 0
时间窗: Often 1
4. Overall how well have you had your urticarial under control in the last four weeks?
Not at all 0
时间窗: A little 1
Not present
时间窗: 0
Up to 25% skin involvement
时间窗: 1
25-50% skin involvement
时间窗: 2
51-75% skin involvement
时间窗: 3
More than 75% skin involvement
时间窗: 4
No
时间窗: 0
Mild
时间窗: 1
Moderate
时间窗: 2
Severe
时间窗: 3
Unbearable and disturbing routine
时间窗: 4
Unbearable
时间窗: 4
Once in 4-5 days
时间窗: 1
Once in alternate day
时间窗: 2
Once in daily
时间窗: 3
Twice daily
时间窗: 4
次要结局
- Change in IgE DLC ESR(30 days)
研究者
Manisha Mehta
National Institute of Ayurveda
