NCT00847184Unknown不适用
Comparison of Airtraq vs. MacIntosh Intubation Via Nasal Approach
Kliniken Essen-Mitte2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 200 人开始时间: 2009年2月1日最近更新:
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 200
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Time for intubation
研究概览
简要总结
Time, success rate, and number of optimising maneuvers for tracheal intubation via the nasal approach are not different when Aitraq technique is used compared to a standard MacIntosh blade.
详细描述
One hundred adult patients with an expected easy intubation and 100 patients with an expected difficult intubation are enrolled. Intubations are performed by two experienced fully boarded anesthesiologists. The design of the study is prospective and randomised.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Single (Participant)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Scheduled for nasal intubation
排除标准
- •Age under 18 years
结局指标
主要结局
Time for intubation
时间窗: 10 month
次要结局
- Success rate for intubation(10 month)
研究者
研究点 (2)
Loading locations...
相似试验
已完成
不适用
Orotracheal Intubation in Adult Patients: A Comparison of Standard Airtraq , Nasotracheal Airtraq Combined With a Stylet Inserted Endotracheal Tube and Standard Airtraq Combined Fiberoptic IntubationDifficult IntubationNCT03709524Kocaeli University119
招募中
3 期
Comparison of insertion of tube in windpipe with the help of C Mac videolaryngoscope(common blade vs. D blade in patients undergoing head and neck cancer surgeries.CTRI/2018/09/015630AIIMS Delhi60
已完成
不适用
A Comparison of McGrath MAC®, Pentax-AWS® and Macintosh Direct Laryngoscopes for Nasotracheal IntubationDifficult IntubationNCT03337555Ajou University School of Medicine123
已完成
不适用
Airtraq Versus Standard Direct Laryngoscopy in the Pediatric AirwayEndotracheal IntubationNCT00874016IWK Health Centre50
已完成
不适用
Comparison between Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscope in tracheal intubation required for general anaesthesiaCTRI/2018/05/013760Seth G s medical college and KEM hospital70