Skip to main content
MedPathMedPath Home
Clinical Trials/NCT00847184
NCT00847184
Unknown
Not Applicable

Comparison of Airtraq vs. MacIntosh Intubation Via Nasal Approach

Kliniken Essen-Mitte1 site in 1 country200 target enrollmentFebruary 2009
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit
ConditionsTracheal Intubation

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Tracheal Intubation
Sponsor
Kliniken Essen-Mitte
Enrollment
200
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Time for intubation
Last Updated
17 years ago
OverviewInvestigatorsEligibility CriteriaOutcomesSitesSimilar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

Time, success rate, and number of optimising maneuvers for tracheal intubation via the nasal approach are not different when Aitraq technique is used compared to a standard MacIntosh blade.

Detailed Description

One hundred adult patients with an expected easy intubation and 100 patients with an expected difficult intubation are enrolled. Intubations are performed by two experienced fully boarded anesthesiologists. The design of the study is prospective and randomised.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
February 2009
End Date
November 2009
Last Updated
17 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Kliniken Essen-Mitte

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Scheduled for nasal intubation

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Age under 18 years

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Time for intubation

Time Frame: 10 month

Secondary Outcomes

  • Success rate for intubation(10 month)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Completed
Not Applicable
Orotracheal Intubation in Adult Patients: A Comparison of Standard Airtraq , Nasotracheal Airtraq Combined With a Stylet Inserted Endotracheal Tube and Standard Airtraq Combined Fiberoptic IntubationDifficult Intubation
NCT03709524Kocaeli University119
Recruiting
Phase 3
Comparison of insertion of tube in windpipe with the help of C Mac videolaryngoscope(common blade vs. D blade in patients undergoing head and neck cancer surgeries.Health Condition 1: C148- Malignant neoplasm of overlappingsites of lip, oral cavity and pharynxHealth Condition 2: null- Patient having head and neck cancer
CTRI/2018/09/015630AIIMS Delhi60
Completed
Not Applicable
A Comparison of McGrath MAC®, Pentax-AWS® and Macintosh Direct Laryngoscopes for Nasotracheal IntubationIntubation;Difficult
NCT03337555Ajou University School of Medicine123
Completed
Not Applicable
Airtraq Versus Standard Direct Laryngoscopy in the Pediatric AirwayEndotracheal Intubation
NCT00874016IWK Health Centre50
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison between Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscope in tracheal intubation required for general anaesthesia
CTRI/2018/05/013760Seth G s medical college and KEM hospital70