Non-rebreather at Flush Rate Compared to Bag Valve Mask With Assist

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Acute Respiratory Failure

• Registration Number: NCT02841592
• Lead Sponsor: Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute

Brief Summary

This crossover investigation enrolls healthy volunteers and compares the exhaled oxygen content (FeO2) between the non-rebreather mask at the flush rate and a bag-valve-mask device at the flush rate, used with active positive pressure assistance.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2016-07
• Study First Submitted: 2016-07-18
• Study First Submitted QC: 2016-07-19
• Study First Posted: 2016-07-22
• Primary Completion: 2016-08
• Study Completion: 2016-08
• Status Verified: 2018-01
• Last Update Submitted: 2018-01-28
• Last Update Posted: 2018-01-30

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 27

Inclusion Criteria

• Age >17

Exclusion Criteria

• Pregnant
• Any facial hair more than stubble that might impede a mask seal

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: CROSSOVER

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Fraction of expired oxygen	3 minutes	The fraction of expired oxygen will be measured after three minutes of preoxygenation

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Hennepin County Medical Center; 🇺🇸 Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States