Double-bundle Versus Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
- Conditions
- ACL Injury
- Registration Number
- NCT06001164
- Lead Sponsor
- Tampere University Hospital
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare double-bundle and single-bundle techniques for ACL reconstruction in a long-term 15-year follow-up. Our hypothesis is that the DB technique is better than the SB technique.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 153
- To be eligible for the study, patients had to meet certain criteria, including primary ACL reconstruction, closed growth plates, and no ligamentous injuries to the contralateral knee.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method osteoarthritis (OA) 15 years which group has more osteoarthritis? Kellgren Lawrence classification. Scale 0-4 (0=no OA)
Lysholm score 15 years subjective evaluation form. Scale 0-100 (100=best)
graft failures 15 years which group has more graft failures? The number of graft failures was assessed by revision surgery.
Range on motion (ROM) of the knee 15 years Which group has more lack of knee extension or lack of knee flexion? Injured knee is always compared to a contralateral "healthy" knee. Measurements were performed with a goniometer. ROM included lack of passive extension (normal \< 3°, nearly normal 3-5°, abnormal 6-10°, and severely abnormal \> 10°) and lack of passive flexion (normal 0-5°, nearly normal 6-15°, abnormal 16-25°, and severely abnormal \> 25°).
One leg hop test 15 years One leg hop test was performed to assess the functional capacity of the knee. The patient hopped a maximum length three times on each leg separately and the best result was recorded for both legs. The result of the operated leg was then compared with that of the non-operated leg.
Pivot shift 15 years which group has more positive pivot shift tests? Always compared to a "healthy" knee.
IKDC subjective evaluation. Scale 0-100 (100=best) 15 years subjective evaluation form
IKDC objective score. Scale 1-4 (1=best) 15 years Overall evaluation of the knee
KT-1000 arthrometer difference 15 years Anteroposterior translation. Always compared to a "healthy" knee. mm.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Department of Orthopaedics, Tampere University Hospital
🇫🇮Tampere, Finland