MedPath

Double-bundle Versus Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
ACL Injury
Registration Number
NCT06001164
Lead Sponsor
Tampere University Hospital
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare double-bundle and single-bundle techniques for ACL reconstruction in a long-term 15-year follow-up. Our hypothesis is that the DB technique is better than the SB technique.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
153
Inclusion Criteria
  • To be eligible for the study, patients had to meet certain criteria, including primary ACL reconstruction, closed growth plates, and no ligamentous injuries to the contralateral knee.
Exclusion Criteria

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
osteoarthritis (OA)15 years

which group has more osteoarthritis? Kellgren Lawrence classification. Scale 0-4 (0=no OA)

Lysholm score15 years

subjective evaluation form. Scale 0-100 (100=best)

graft failures15 years

which group has more graft failures? The number of graft failures was assessed by revision surgery.

Range on motion (ROM) of the knee15 years

Which group has more lack of knee extension or lack of knee flexion? Injured knee is always compared to a contralateral "healthy" knee. Measurements were performed with a goniometer. ROM included lack of passive extension (normal \< 3°, nearly normal 3-5°, abnormal 6-10°, and severely abnormal \> 10°) and lack of passive flexion (normal 0-5°, nearly normal 6-15°, abnormal 16-25°, and severely abnormal \> 25°).

One leg hop test15 years

One leg hop test was performed to assess the functional capacity of the knee. The patient hopped a maximum length three times on each leg separately and the best result was recorded for both legs. The result of the operated leg was then compared with that of the non-operated leg.

Pivot shift15 years

which group has more positive pivot shift tests? Always compared to a "healthy" knee.

IKDC subjective evaluation. Scale 0-100 (100=best)15 years

subjective evaluation form

IKDC objective score. Scale 1-4 (1=best)15 years

Overall evaluation of the knee

KT-1000 arthrometer difference15 years

Anteroposterior translation. Always compared to a "healthy" knee. mm.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Department of Orthopaedics, Tampere University Hospital

🇫🇮

Tampere, Finland

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath