跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00849095
NCT00849095已完成3 期

As Needed Budesonide/Formoterol Combination Versus Regular Budesonide/Formoterol Combination Plus as Needed Terbutaline in Mild-Moderate Persistent Asthma

Università degli Studi di Ferrara31 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 860 人开始时间: 2009年4月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
3 期
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
860
试验地点
31
主要终点
comparison between groups of the relative risk for treatment failure

研究概览

简要总结

Study No.001 about Budesonide/Formoterol use in ASthMA sponsored by Agenzia Italiana del FArmaco (Italian Drug Agency) (AIFA-ASMA-BF-001) The aim of the study is to verify whether asthma not controlled by low doses inhaled corticosteroids, thus in need for step up therapy, can be equally controlled by guidelines recommended regular bid treatment with long acting beta agonist/inhaled corticosteroid (ICS/LABA) combination or the symptom driven use of an ICS/LABA combination in the absence of maintenance therapy. The study is designed to be able to evaluate the non inferiority of regular placebo plus prn inhaled budesonide/formoterol (experimental treatment) versus regular, twice daily 160/4.5 mcg inhaled budesonide/formoterol combination plus prn inhaled terbutaline (guidelines recommended treatment).

详细描述

Asthma is a problem worldwide, with an estimated 300 million affected individuals.There is evidence that asthma prevalence has been increasing in the last decades in some countries, including Italy. Analyses of the cost of asthma lead to conclude that the burden of the disease depend on the extent to which exacerbations are avoided since emergency treatment is more expensive than regular treatment.

Based on solid evidence, international guidelines recommend regular treatment with low dose ICS for mild persistent asthma and treatment with combination therapy [low dose ICS plus long-acting beta2-agonists (LABA)] for patients with asthma not controlled by low doses ICS alone. Recent studies have undermined the axiom that treatment with ICS must be regular to achieve and maintain asthma control, as equivalent control has been obtained either with prn use of an inhaled combination of a short acting beta2 agonist (SABA) and an ICS, or with a short course of 10 days high dose ICS at the start of exacerbations. In moderate-severe asthma regularly treated with inhaled ICS/LABA combination, the symptom-driven use of the same inhaled ICS/LABA combination as reliever is superior to the symptom-driven use of SABA or LABA alone.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Male or female out-patient aged from 18 years to 65 years
  • Clinical diagnosis of moderate persistent asthma for at least 6 months, according to GINA revised version 2006 guidelines
  • Post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume (FEV1) at least 80% of the predicted
  • Either positive methacholine challenge test (PC20 FEV1< 4mg/ml or PD20 FEV1<0.8 mg) or positive response to the reversibility test in the last year
  • Asthma either not adequately controlled with low-dose (≤500 mcg beclomethasone or equivalent) inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) or controlled by bid inhaled combination of low-dose ICS/long acting beta-2 agonists (LABA)
  • A co-operative attitude and ability to be trained to correctly use the dry powder inhalator and to complete the diary cards
  • Written informed consent obtained

排除标准

  • Inability to carry out pulmonary function testing
  • Moderate severe asthma associated with reduced lung function
  • History of near-fatal asthma and/or admission intensive care unit because of asthma
  • 3 or more courses of oral corticosteroids or hospitalization for asthma during the previous year
  • Diagnosis of COPD as defined by the GOLD guidelines
  • Evidence of severe asthma exacerbation or symptomatic infection of the airways in the previous 8 weeks
  • Current smokers or recent (less than one year) ex-smokers, defined as smoking at least 10 pack/years
  • History or current evidence of heart failure, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, severe hypertension, or cardiac arrhythmias
  • Diabetes mellitis
  • Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) or coronary artery by-pass graft (CABG) during the previous six months
  • Abnormal ECG
  • Clinically significant or unstable concurrent diseases: uncontrolled hyperthyroidism, significant hepatic impairment, poorly controlled pulmonary disease (tuberculosis, active mycotic infection of the lung), gastrointestinal (e.g., active peptic ulcer), neurological or haematological autoimmune diseases
  • Malignancy
  • Any chronic diseases with prognosis < 2 years
  • Pregnant or lactating females or not able to exclude pregnancy during the study period
  • History of alcohol or drug abuse
  • Patients treated with monoamine oxidase inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants or beta-blockers as regular use
  • Allergy, sensitivity or intolerance to study drugs and/or study drug formulation ingredients
  • Patients unlikely to comply with the protocol or unable to understand the nature, scope and possible consequences of the study
  • Patients who received any investigational new drug within the last 12 weeks
  • Patients who have been previously enrolled in this study

研究组 & 干预措施

as needed medication

Experimental

patients assigned to this arm will take bid inhaled placebo plus prn inhaled 160/4.5 mcg budesonide/formoterol combination

干预措施: budesonide/formoterol combination (PRN) (Drug)

as needed medication

Experimental

patients assigned to this arm will take bid inhaled placebo plus prn inhaled 160/4.5 mcg budesonide/formoterol combination

干预措施: placebo (Drug)

guideline treatment

Active Comparator

bid inhaled 160/4.5 mcg budesonide/formoterol combination plus prn 500 mcg terbutaline

干预措施: budesonide/formoterol combination (Drug)

guideline treatment

Active Comparator

bid inhaled 160/4.5 mcg budesonide/formoterol combination plus prn 500 mcg terbutaline

干预措施: terbutaline (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

comparison between groups of the relative risk for treatment failure

时间窗: 52 weeks

次要结局

  • number of treatment failures(52 weeks)
  • time to first treatment failure(52 weeks)
  • differences between groups of lung function parameters, quality of life, symptoms score, use of as needed medication, adverse events(52 weeks)

研究者

发起方
Università degli Studi di Ferrara
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Alberto Papi, MD

Professor

Università degli Studi di Ferrara

研究点 (31)

Loading locations...

相似试验