MedPath

Lumbar Puncture in Emergency Under Nitrous OXide

Phase 4
Conditions
Anxiety
Pain
Interventions
Other: Placebo
Registration Number
NCT03941990
Lead Sponsor
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Brief Summary

Lumbar puncture (LP) is a frequent exam that can cause pain and anxiety. In a scheduled setting, it has been shown that nitrous oxide use during the procedure was able to reduce both pain and anxiety. The goal of this trial is to confirm these results in a more heterogeneous group of patients having a LP, in an emergency setting.

Detailed Description

Nitrous oxide (N2O) has analgesic and anxiolytic properties that are known for more than a century. Nonetheless, it's use during lumbar puncture in adults has only been investigated in a scheduled setting.Thus, this study is designed to evaluate the analgesic effect of N2O on the pain induced during lumbar puncture.

Patients with urgent lumbar puncture realized for diagnosis purposes will be randomized in 2 groups. One group will inhale N2O for the 5 minutes before the puncture and during the rest of the procedure. The second group will inhale compressed air during the same period. Neither the investigator realizing the lumbar puncture, nor the patient will know which type of gaz they are inhaling (double-blinding).

The maximal pain level that occurred during the procedure will be evaluated on a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). NRS will also be used to evaluate the maximal anxiety induced by the procedure.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
88
Inclusion Criteria
  • Adult patients coming in emergency service who need a lumbar puncture in emergency for a diagnostic purpose
  • at least 18
  • affiliated to the French state healthcare insurance system
  • able to give consent to participation
Exclusion Criteria
  • Previous use of nitrous oxide (medical or recreational)
  • Contra-indication to nitrous oxide use
  • Face mask phobia
  • Stage II obesity (BMI > 35)
  • Hemodynamic instability and/or any case when coagulation results cannot be waited
  • Cognitive condition defined by a previous Mini Mental State Examination < 24/30
  • Confusion or any consciousness disorder that might interfere with judgment or consent
  • Patient unable to communicate verbally
  • Patient placed under a legal protection measure (tutorship, curatorship or a mandate)
  • Any medical condition that might contra-indicate medical research, in physician's opinion

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
PlaceboPlacebowill inhale medical air throughout the entire procedure (22% O2 + N2 Q.S.)
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Maximal pain perceived during the lumbar puncture evaluated using a simple numeric 0-10 pain scale2-3 minutes after the end of gas inhalation

Maximal level of pain during lumbar puncture. The patient will be asked to circle the digit that best describes the maximal level of pain felt during the procedure. If the patient is too painful and/or is incapacitated, the collection notebook will be fulfilled by the care provider after asking the following question: "On a scale of 0 to 10, 0 being the absence of pain and 10 the maximal pain you can imagine, what is the digit best describing the maximal pain you felt during the procedure?"

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Side effectsFrom the beginning of gas inhalation to a minimum of 2 hours later

Every side effect reported by the patients attributable to gas inhalation during the procedure up to emergency service discharge. Presence, intensity and reversibility will be recorded

Number of attempts before successful LP2-3 minutes after the end of lumbar puncture

Comparison of number of attempts needed to get spinal fluid, defined as number of needle removals for a single exam.

Spinal puncture duration2-3 minutes after the end of lumbar puncture

Comparison of LP duration between both groups measured in minutes (from the beginning of gas inhalation to needle removal).

Patient Satisfaction2-3 minutes after the end of gas inhalation

overall satisfaction based on a 0-10 score and proportion of patients that would accept another lumbar puncture in the same conditions

Induced costthrough study completion, an average 4 months

supplementary cost induced by the use of nitrous oxide inhalation for a total of 88 patients throughout the study (gas and consumables such as masks and pipes)

Blinding quality2-3 minutes after the end of gas inhalation

Assessment of blinding in clinical trials (according to Bang et al. 2004)

Maximal anxiety perceived during lumbar puncture evaluated using a simple numeric 0-10 scale2-3 minutes after the end of gas inhalation

Proportion of patients with significant anxiety

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

CHU de Clermont-Ferrand

🇫🇷

Clermont-Ferrand, Auvergne Rhône-Alpes, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath