Clinical Validation of the Apollo Daily Disposable Soft Contact Lenses
- Conditions
- Myopia
- Interventions
- Device: Test LensDevice: Control Lens
- Registration Number
- NCT05035017
- Lead Sponsor
- Coopervision, Inc.
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to confirm the design specifications of a Test lens and validate its clinical performance.
- Detailed Description
This was a double-masked, randomized, bilateral two-day crossover, dispensing study design. Subjects were randomized to wear the Test lens or Control lens bilaterally in random order and on a daily wear, single-use basis for a period of 2 days each.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 35
- Has had a self-reported oculo-visual examination in the last two years.
- Is at least 18 years of age and has full legal capacity to volunteer.
- Has read and understood the information consent letter.
- Is willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule.
- Is an adapted soft contact lens wearer, having worn contact lenses for a minimum 4 weeks prior to the study
- Has spectacle cylinder ≤1.00D in both eyes.
- Has spherical contact lens power requirement between -1.00D and -6.00D in both eyes.
- Has manifest refraction visual acuities (VA) equal to or better than logMAR equivalent of 20/20 in each eye.
- Wears CLs in both eyes (monovision acceptable, but not monofit)
- Has clear corneas and no active ocular disease.
- Has not worn lenses for at least 12 hours before the examination
- Is willing to wear the study contact lenses for a minimum 8 hours on at least two consecutive days for each study pair.
- Has never worn contact lenses before.
- Has any systemic disease affecting ocular health.
- Is using any concomitant systemic or topical medications that will affect ocular health.
- Has any ocular pathology or severe insufficiency of lacrimal secretion (moderate to severe dry eyes) that would affect the wearing of contact lenses.
- Has persistent, clinically significant corneal or conjunctival staining using sodium fluorescein dye.
- Has any clinically significant lid or conjunctival abnormalities, active neovascularization or any central corneal scars.
- Is aphakic.
- Has undergone corneal refractive surgery.
- Is participating in any other type of eye-related clinical or research study.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Test Lens, then Control Lens Test Lens Participants wore Test Lens for 2 days, and then Control Lens for 2 days Control Lens, then Test Lens Test Lens Participants wore Control Lens for 2 days, and then Test Lens for 2 days Test Lens, then Control Lens Control Lens Participants wore Test Lens for 2 days, and then Control Lens for 2 days Control Lens, then Test Lens Control Lens Participants wore Control Lens for 2 days, and then Test Lens for 2 days
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Overall Comfort With Lens 2 days Participants rated their overall comfort once after 2 days of wear a 0-100 integer scale, where 0=Cannot be tolerated and 100=Excellent comfort.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Overall Lens Handling 2 days Participant response on overall handling (insertion, removal, and holding) of contact lenses assessed once after 2 days of wear, on the third day. Measured on a 0-100 integer scale, where 0=Cannot be managed, 100=Excellent handling.
Overall Vision Quality 2 days Participant response measured once after 2 days of wear on a 0-100 integer scale, where 0= Unacceptable, 100=Excellent Vision.
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance 2 days Measured once after 2 days of wear by investigator on lens fit alone (excludes comfort, vision, orientation) on a 0-4 scale, 0.25 steps, where 0=Can't be worn and 4=Optimum
Anterior Ocular Health - Corneal Staining Extent 2 days Assessed once after 2 days of wear with slit lamp biomicroscopy and graded on a 0-4 integer scale, where 0=No Staining and 4=\>45% of area. Lower values represented a better outcome, e.g., a grading value of 1 would represent less corneal staining than a grade of 4. Locations (central, nasal, temporal, superior, inferior) were graded separately.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Indiana University School of Optometry
🇺🇸Bloomington, Indiana, United States