MedPath

Clinical Validation of the Apollo Daily Disposable Soft Contact Lenses

Completed
Conditions
Myopia
Interventions
Device: Test Lens
Device: Control Lens
Registration Number
NCT05035017
Lead Sponsor
Coopervision, Inc.
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study was to confirm the design specifications of a Test lens and validate its clinical performance.

Detailed Description

This was a double-masked, randomized, bilateral two-day crossover, dispensing study design. Subjects were randomized to wear the Test lens or Control lens bilaterally in random order and on a daily wear, single-use basis for a period of 2 days each.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
35
Inclusion Criteria
  • Has had a self-reported oculo-visual examination in the last two years.
  • Is at least 18 years of age and has full legal capacity to volunteer.
  • Has read and understood the information consent letter.
  • Is willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule.
  • Is an adapted soft contact lens wearer, having worn contact lenses for a minimum 4 weeks prior to the study
  • Has spectacle cylinder ≤1.00D in both eyes.
  • Has spherical contact lens power requirement between -1.00D and -6.00D in both eyes.
  • Has manifest refraction visual acuities (VA) equal to or better than logMAR equivalent of 20/20 in each eye.
  • Wears CLs in both eyes (monovision acceptable, but not monofit)
  • Has clear corneas and no active ocular disease.
  • Has not worn lenses for at least 12 hours before the examination
  • Is willing to wear the study contact lenses for a minimum 8 hours on at least two consecutive days for each study pair.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Has never worn contact lenses before.
  • Has any systemic disease affecting ocular health.
  • Is using any concomitant systemic or topical medications that will affect ocular health.
  • Has any ocular pathology or severe insufficiency of lacrimal secretion (moderate to severe dry eyes) that would affect the wearing of contact lenses.
  • Has persistent, clinically significant corneal or conjunctival staining using sodium fluorescein dye.
  • Has any clinically significant lid or conjunctival abnormalities, active neovascularization or any central corneal scars.
  • Is aphakic.
  • Has undergone corneal refractive surgery.
  • Is participating in any other type of eye-related clinical or research study.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Test Lens, then Control LensTest LensParticipants wore Test Lens for 2 days, and then Control Lens for 2 days
Control Lens, then Test LensTest LensParticipants wore Control Lens for 2 days, and then Test Lens for 2 days
Test Lens, then Control LensControl LensParticipants wore Test Lens for 2 days, and then Control Lens for 2 days
Control Lens, then Test LensControl LensParticipants wore Control Lens for 2 days, and then Test Lens for 2 days
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Overall Comfort With Lens2 days

Participants rated their overall comfort once after 2 days of wear a 0-100 integer scale, where 0=Cannot be tolerated and 100=Excellent comfort.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Overall Lens Handling2 days

Participant response on overall handling (insertion, removal, and holding) of contact lenses assessed once after 2 days of wear, on the third day. Measured on a 0-100 integer scale, where 0=Cannot be managed, 100=Excellent handling.

Overall Vision Quality2 days

Participant response measured once after 2 days of wear on a 0-100 integer scale, where 0= Unacceptable, 100=Excellent Vision.

Overall Lens Fit Acceptance2 days

Measured once after 2 days of wear by investigator on lens fit alone (excludes comfort, vision, orientation) on a 0-4 scale, 0.25 steps, where 0=Can't be worn and 4=Optimum

Anterior Ocular Health - Corneal Staining Extent2 days

Assessed once after 2 days of wear with slit lamp biomicroscopy and graded on a 0-4 integer scale, where 0=No Staining and 4=\>45% of area. Lower values represented a better outcome, e.g., a grading value of 1 would represent less corneal staining than a grade of 4. Locations (central, nasal, temporal, superior, inferior) were graded separately.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Indiana University School of Optometry

🇺🇸

Bloomington, Indiana, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath