"Blind" vs. Fluoroscopy-Guided Steroid Injections for Knee Osteoarthritis
Not Applicable
Withdrawn
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis
- Registration Number
- NCT02104726
- Lead Sponsor
- Johns Hopkins University
- Brief Summary
To compare relative efficacy of intraarticular steroid injection using anatomic landmarks vs. fluoroscopy guided technique in decreasing knee osteoarthritis pain 1 month after the procedure.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- WITHDRAWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- Not specified
Inclusion Criteria
- Adults with knee OA clinically deemed to qualify for steroid injection
Exclusion Criteria
- Children Non-English Speakers Pregnant
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Numerical Rating Scale (pain) 1 month Decrease in pain from baseline at one month
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What molecular mechanisms underlie corticosteroid efficacy in knee osteoarthritis pain reduction via intraarticular injection?
How does fluoroscopy-guided steroid injection compare to blind techniques in terms of long-term cartilage preservation outcomes for knee OA patients?
Which synovial fluid biomarkers correlate with response to intraarticular corticosteroid injections in NCT02104726 knee osteoarthritis study?
What are the adverse event profiles of blind vs. fluoroscopy-guided steroid injections for knee osteoarthritis in Johns Hopkins trials?
How do combination therapies of corticosteroids with hyaluronic acid or PRP compare to standalone steroid injections for knee OA management?