Sectional Versus Full Glass Ceramic Laminate Veneers

Not Applicable

Active, not recruiting

• Conditions: Spacing of Anterior Teeth
• Interventions: Procedure: Glass ceramic sectional veneer; Procedure: Glass ceramic laminate veneer

• Registration Number: NCT06472180
• Lead Sponsor: October University for Modern Sciences and Arts

Brief Summary

The aim of the study is to assess the marginal adaptation, color stability and clinical performance of glass ceramic sectional veneers compared to full laminate veneers There's two null hypotheses , the first is that there is no difference in the marginal adaptation of sectional and full glass ceramic laminate veneers.

the Second is that there is no apparent change in color stability and clinical performance of sectional and full glass ceramic laminate veneers.

Detailed Description

Although seeking for more minimally invasive treatment modalities with the use of the new advancements in ceramics and adhesive materials, however there is insufficient clinical studies assessing the ultraconservative sectional veneers has been published although there are many published case reports proving their success .

Hence the aim of this study is to assess the sectional veneers compared to laminate veneer regarding marginal adaptation, color stability and clinical performance

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2024-05-01
• Status Verified: 2024-06
• Study First Submitted: 2024-06-17
• Study First Submitted QC: 2024-06-21
• Last Update Submitted: 2024-06-21
• Study First Posted: 2024-06-25
• Last Update Posted: 2024-06-25
• Primary Completion: 2025-05-01
• Study Completion: 2025-05-01

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 22

Inclusion Criteria

• Patients seeking for esthetics with the following criteria
• Male or female patients age range above 18 years old
• Minor esthetic defects in anterior region
• Multiple spacing
• diastemas
• Incisal fracture
• Initial proximal caries
• Patients able physically and psychologically to tolerate restorative procedures
• Patients willing to return for follow-up examinations and evaluation
• Class I occlusion

Exclusion Criteria

• Patients free of:
• Tempromandibular disorders
• Para-functional habits
• Cracked teeth
• Moderate or deep caries
• Heavily discolored teeth
• Heavy smokers
• Enamel defects compromising bonding
• Active periodontal disease
• Pulpal disease
• Mobility
• Occlusal disturbances
• Class II and III occlusion

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
intervention- Glass ceramic sectional veneer	Glass ceramic sectional veneer	participants receive Glass ceramic sectional veneer covering only the area of defect
control-Glass ceramic laminate veneer	Glass ceramic laminate veneer	participants receive laminate veneers made of glass ceramics as it is well documented in the literatures as successful restoration modality

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Marginal adaptation of sectional and full glass ceramic laminate veneer using digital device intraoral scanner	Baseline,3,6,9,12 months	assessment of the marginal adaptation using digital device intraoral scanner software

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Clinical performance	Baseline,3,6,9,12 months	categorical outcome of clinical performance using FDI(World Dental Federation) criteria
Color stability	Baseline,3,6,9,12 months	assessment of the Color stability using intraoral scanner

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

October University for Modern Sciences & Arts; 🇪🇬 Giza, Giza, 6th October City, Egypt