跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04787133
NCT04787133撤回不适用

Assessment of the Perioperative Experience of Patients According to Different Preoperative Anesthesia Consultation (PAC) Modalities

Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家开始时间: 2022年2月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
撤回
试验地点
1
主要终点
Assessment of patient satisfaction with a perioperative anesthetic evaluation

研究概览

简要总结

Compare the experience of patients receiving an "optimized" preoperative anesthesia consultation (PAC) performed by a Nurse Anesthetist (supervised by an anesthetist) to those receiving a "standard" CSA ( CSA by an anesthetist alone).

详细描述

Preoperative anesthesia consultations (PACs) are a key moment in the perioperative care journey. During the PAC, the doctor assesses the patient's state of health (allowing an assessment of the perioperative risk), establishes the anesthesia protocol and writes the preoperative prescriptions. PAC also helps inform and educate patients to reduce their anxiety.

Indeed, if the perioperative care pathway and the risks associated with anesthesia are poorly understood, there is an increased risk of preoperative anxiety, poor compliance with preoperative prescriptions, and therefore potential cancellation of the surgical intervention.

In many countries, preoperative PACs are performed by nurses trained and supervised by anesthetists. These PACs take longer than a consultation carried out by a doctor alone, but would on the one hand have a positive effect on patient education and, on the other hand, ultimately reduce the time and costs associated with the PAC . On the other hand, the impact of PACs performed by nurses supervised by physicians on the perioperative experience of patients and on the rate of cancellations of scheduled interventions has not yet been demonstrated.

Since 2013, so-called "optimized" consultations (PAC carried out by a state-certified nurse - IDE - supervised by an anesthesiologist) have been carried out at the Adolphe de Rothschild Foundation (Paris), for patients having a scheduled surgery intervention. cataract under locoregional or general anesthesia. First, the IDE collects the patient's history and treatments and informs him of the perioperative care pathway. In a second step, the doctor performs the pre-anesthetic medical examination, completes the medical examination and writes the appropriate pre and postoperative prescriptions. This method of consultation made it possible to optimize medical time while providing complete, even better, information to the patient.

That is why optimized PACs may improve the patient's perioperative experience and reduce preoperative cancellations regardless of the type of surgery. programmed.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patient over 18 years old
  • Must benefit from an anesthesia consultation for general or regional anesthesia for scheduled surgery, whatever it is.
  • Express consent to participate in the study
  • Affiliate or beneficiary of a social security scheme

排除标准

  • Patient benefiting from a legal protection measure
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
  • Patient unable to understand and read French, as well as to complete a self-administered questionnaire
  • Patient with mental retardation with impaired judgment

结局指标

主要结局

Assessment of patient satisfaction with a perioperative anesthetic evaluation

时间窗: 48 hours

Patient satisfaction will be assess within 48h after surgery using the "Evaluation du Vécu de l'Anesthésie" or "EVAN" (EVAN-G for EVAN-General anesthesia or EVAN-LR for EVAN-locoregional anesthesia). The EVAN-G includes 26 items; six specific scores (Attention, Information, Discomfort, Privacy, Waiting and Pain) and one global index score. The EVAN-LR comprises 19 items; five specific scores (Attention, Information, Discomfort, Waiting, and Pain) and one global index score. Specific and global index scores were linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale, with 100 indicating the best possible level of satisfaction and 0 indicating the worst.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Network
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验