NCT02090218
Terminated
Not Applicable
I-Gel Versus Current Practice in Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest by Paramedics in Norway - a Prospective Stepped Wedge Crossover Trial
Haukeland University Hospital4 sites in 1 country550 target enrollmentFebruary 2014
ConditionsOut of Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest
- Sponsor
- Haukeland University Hospital
- Enrollment
- 550
- Locations
- 4
- Primary Endpoint
- ventilation success
- Status
- Terminated
- Last Updated
- 2 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The main objective of this trial is to compare the effectiveness of a newer supraglottic airway method (the i-Gel), compared to current airway management practice in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests treated by Norwegian ambulance services.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients requiring and receiving advanced airway management on ambulance missions. Advanced airway management is defined as the attempted insertion of an airway adjunct (I-Gel, laryngeal tube or ETI) or the administration of ventilatory assistance/support (including bag-mask ventilation (BMV) or other ventilatory support.
- •Adult patients (\> 18 years).
Exclusion Criteria
- •Non-adult patients / minors (\< 18 years).
- •Traumatic cardiac arrest.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
ventilation success
Time Frame: up to 24 hours
ventilation success defined as successful insertion of device with visible chest movement with each ventilation, audible air passage on auscultation, and ETCO2 confirmation (if available) of tube placement
Secondary Outcomes
- survival to hospital discharge / 30-day survival(up to 30 days)
- insertion related complications(up to 24 hours)
- cerebral function assessed by Glascow Outcome Score at discharge from hospital(participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks)
- levels of ETCO2 related to the presence and quality of bystander CPR(up to 24 hours)
Study Sites (4)
Loading locations...
Similar Trials
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of I-gel to the Laryngeal Mask AirwayEndotracheal IntubationSupraglottic AirwayNCT00706823The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston50
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of Two Type of Laryngeal Mask : I-Gel & LMA ProSealEndotracheal IntubationNCT00624403University Hospital, Bordeaux700
Unknown
Not Applicable
A Study Comparing the Supraglottic Airway Devices and Endotracheal Tube During Controlled Ventilation for Laparoscopic SurgeryThe Comparison of the I-gel and Endotracheal Tube About in Different Ventilation Settings During Laparoscopic SurgeryNCT02462915National Taiwan University Hospital40
Completed
Not Applicable
I-gel vs. Endotracheal Intubation for Laparoscopic Gynaecological ProceduresIntubation ComplicationLaryngeal Mask ComplicationNCT05782517Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel120
Completed
Not Applicable
I-gel Plus Supraglottic Airway Device for Surgical Procedures in Prone PositionGeneral AnesthesiaAirway ManagementSupraglottic AirwayNCT06602817Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf28