Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00360789
NCT00360789CompletedPhase 1

The Effects of Standardized Physical Therapy and Functional Strength Training on Upper Limb Function and Neuromuscular Weakness After Stroke: a Pilot Study

St George's, University of London2 sites in 1 country30 target enrollmentStarted: June 2005Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 1
Status
Completed
Enrollment
30
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis that adding functional strength training to UK conventional therapy improves muscle function and walking than either UK conventional therapy alone or increased intensity of UK conventional therapy.

Detailed Description

Neuromuscular weakness occurs frequently after stroke and the processes underlying recovery are still poorly understood. Accepted practice in UK physiotherapy is to avoid training of muscle strength after stroke but there is preliminary evidence that it might be effective.

An observer-blind randomised pilot clinical trial (Phase II). Subjects will be within 3 months of first stroke with some voluntary movement in the paretic upper limb.

A Research Physiotherapist, blinded to measurement, will recruit subjects, allocate subjects to one of three intervention groups using sequentially numbered sealed envelopes containing previously allocated intervention cards and provide interventions. Ten participants will be recruited to each group therefore the trial will recuit 30 participants. The Research Assessor, blinded to intervention allocation will undertake all measurements.

Conventional therapy (control) will be provided as normal for the clinical setting, the additional conventional therapy (experimental 1)or functional strength training (experimental 2) will be provided for one hour, five times a week for six weeks. Subjects in the two experimental groups will also receive the conventional therapy standard in their clinical setting.

Blinded measurement will be made before randomisation, at the end of intervention and 12-weeks thereafter. Primary outcomes are the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)and the Nine Hole Peg Test (9HPT). The secondary outcomes are peak torque around the elbow joint in elbow flexion and extension, grip force, pinch force, smoothness of movement during turning a cranked wheel and reciprocal inniveration of biceps and triceps during turning of a cranked wheel.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Be between one week and three months after stroke when recruited to the study
  • Have some voluntary muscle activity in the paretic upper limb

Exclusion Criteria

  • Obvious unilateral visuospatial neglect
  • Upper limb movement deficits attributable to non-stroke pathology

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)

Nine Hole Peg Test (9HPT)

Secondary Outcomes

  • pinch force
  • smoothness of movement during turning a cranked wheel
  • peak torque around the elbow joint in elbow flexion and extension
  • grip force
  • reciprocal inneveration of biceps and triceps during turning of a cranked wheel.

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials