Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00002633
NCT00002633
Completed
Phase 3

Phase III Randomized Trial Comparing Total Androgen Blockade Versus Total Androgen Blockade Plus Pelvic Irradiation in Clinical Stage T3-4, N0, M0 Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate

NCIC Clinical Trials Group15 sites in 1 country361 target enrollmentFebruary 8, 1995

Overview

Phase
Phase 3
Intervention
bicalutamide
Conditions
Prostate Cancer
Sponsor
NCIC Clinical Trials Group
Enrollment
361
Locations
15
Primary Endpoint
Overall survival
Status
Completed
Last Updated
6 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

RATIONALE: Hormones can stimulate the growth of prostate cancer cells. Hormone therapy may fight prostate cancer by reducing the production of androgens. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. It is not yet known whether hormone therapy plus surgery is more effective than hormone therapy plus radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying giving hormone therapy alone to see how well it works compared to giving hormone therapy together with bilateral orchiectomy or radiation therapy in treating patients with stage III or stage IV prostate cancer.

Detailed Description

OBJECTIVES: * Compare the overall survival, disease specific survival, and time to progression in patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the prostate treated with total androgen suppression with or without pelvic irradiation. * Compare the symptomatic control as measured by the rates of surgical interventions needed for control of local disease (e.g., transurethral resections, stent insertions, nephrostomies, and colostomies) in patients treated with these regimens. * Compare the quality of life of patients treated with these regimens. * Compare the sensitivity of the EORTC-QLQ-C30+3 and a trial-specific checklist (PR17) with the FACT-P questionnaire in measuring changes in quality of life of patients treated with these regimens. OUTLINE: This a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to center, initial PSA level (less than 20 vs 20-50 vs greater than 50 ng/mL), method of node staging (clinical \[no CT scan\] vs radiological \[CT scan negative\] vs surgical), Gleason score (less than 8 vs 8-10), prior hormonal therapy (excluding orchiectomy) (yes vs no), and choice of hormonal therapy (bilateral orchiectomy with or without antiandrogen vs luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone \[LHRH\] with antiandrogen). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. * Arm I: Patients receive antiandrogen therapy comprising oral flutamide every 8 hours, oral nilutamide every 8 hours for 1 month and then once daily, or oral bicalutamide once daily. Patients also choose to undergo bilateral orchiectomy or LHRH agonist therapy comprising goserelin subcutaneously (SC) every 4 weeks (short-acting formulation) or every 3 months (long-acting formulation), leuprolide intramuscularly every 4 weeks (short-acting formulation) or every 3 months (long-acting formulation), or buserelin SC every 8 weeks or every 12 weeks. Patients choosing orchiectomy may receive an antiandrogen for at least 6 weeks before surgery to counter any flare phenomenon and may continue the antiandrogen after surgery (at the physician's discretion). * Arm II: Patients undergo total androgen ablation as in arm I. Patients with node-negative dissection undergo radiotherapy 5 days a week for 6.5-7 weeks. All other patients undergo radiotherapy 5 days a week for 5 weeks, followed by boost radiotherapy 5 days a week for 2-2.4 weeks. Hormonal therapy on both arms continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Quality of life is assessed at baseline, on the last day of radiotherapy, at 6 months, and then every 6 months thereafter. Patients are followed at 1, 2, and 6 months and then every 6 months thereafter. PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 1,200 patients will be accrued for this study within 7.5 years.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
February 8, 1995
End Date
January 6, 2012
Last Updated
6 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
Male

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Arms & Interventions

Total Androgen Blockade

Intervention: bicalutamide

Total Androgen Blockade

Intervention: buserelin

Total Androgen Blockade

Intervention: flutamide

Total Androgen Blockade

Intervention: goserelin

Total Androgen Blockade

Intervention: leuprolide acetate

Total Androgen Blockade

Intervention: nilutamide

Total Androgen Blockade

Intervention: orchiectomy

Total Androgen Blockade Vs TA Blockade Plus Pelvic Irradiation

Intervention: bicalutamide

Total Androgen Blockade Vs TA Blockade Plus Pelvic Irradiation

Intervention: buserelin

Total Androgen Blockade Vs TA Blockade Plus Pelvic Irradiation

Intervention: flutamide

Total Androgen Blockade Vs TA Blockade Plus Pelvic Irradiation

Intervention: goserelin

Total Androgen Blockade Vs TA Blockade Plus Pelvic Irradiation

Intervention: leuprolide acetate

Total Androgen Blockade Vs TA Blockade Plus Pelvic Irradiation

Intervention: nilutamide

Total Androgen Blockade Vs TA Blockade Plus Pelvic Irradiation

Intervention: orchiectomy

Total Androgen Blockade Vs TA Blockade Plus Pelvic Irradiation

Intervention: radiation therapy

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Overall survival

Time Frame: 10 years

Secondary Outcomes

  • Quality of life assessed by EORTC-QLQ-C30 + 3 and a trial-specific checklist (PR17) or the FACT-P questionnaire(10 years)
  • Disease specific survival(10 years)
  • Time to disease progression(10 years)
  • Symptomatic local control measured by surgical intervention rate(10 years)

Study Sites (15)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials