Neuromodulation for Accidental Bowel Leakage
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 166
- 试验地点
- 18
- 主要终点
- Change From Baseline St. Mark's (Vaizey) Score
研究概览
简要总结
This study is a multi-center, randomized clinical trial of women with refractory accidental bowel leakage (ABL) symptoms who have failed to achieve satisfactory symptom control from 2 first-line treatments for ABL: supervised pelvic muscle training (PMT) and constipating medication. The purpose of this study is to compare percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) to a validated sham to determine if PTNS is effective for the treatment of fecal incontinence (FI) in women.
The investigators will test the null hypothesis that change from baseline in St. Mark's (Vaizey) score after 12 weeks of stimulation is not significantly different in women with symptomatic ABL receiving PTNS treatments compared to women receiving sham PTNS treatments.
详细描述
The overarching goal of this randomized clinical trial is to determine if PTNS is more effective than sham PTNS for the treatment of FI in women after 12 weeks of treatment and 1 year after initiating treatment. This is a two-part trial with a Run-In Phase prior to randomization. The trial has the following primary aim:
To determine whether the change from baseline in St. Mark's (Vaizey) score in women with symptomatic ABL undergoing PTNS differs from sham after 12 weeks of stimulation.
Additional secondary aims include:
- To compare changes from baseline in self-reported functional outcomes after 12 weekly stimulation sessions in both PTNS and sham groups in Part 1.
- To determine whether symptom relief amongst study "responders" can be sustained for one year with maintenance treatments in Part II.
- To determine the impact of completing a bowel diary and receiving education on FI on symptom severity.
- To determine the ability of the PFDN ABL phone app bowel diary to detect changes from baseline in fecal incontinence episodes recorded to after 12 weeks of stimulation sessions.
- To determine the association between St. Mark's score and both fat and fiber intake alone and in combination.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Single (Participant)
盲法说明
Participants will remain masked to subject treatment assignment throughout the trial. To maintain masking of participants, the duration of treatment sessions for both the PTNS and sham groups will be 30 minutes and will be conducted with subjects in a supine position with the knees comfortably abducted and flexed. The leg and foot involved in treatment will be obscured from the subject's view with a portable anesthesia drape frame to which an exam sheet will be secured.
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- Female
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Women ≥ 18 years of age
- •FI symptoms ≥ 3 months
- •Baseline St. Mark's score of ≥ 12
- •Attended ≥ 2 supervised PMT for ABL
- •Intolerance, unwillingness, or inadequate response to constipating medications
- •Current negative colon cancer screening based on the USPSTF's recommendation for colorectal cancer screening (2016)
排除标准
- •Previous PTNS treatment
- •History of uncontrolled diarrhea in the past 3 months (usual or most common stool type over the preceding 3 months of 7 on the Bristol Stool Form Scale)
- •History of severe constipation in the past 3 months (usual or most common stool type over the preceding 3 months of 1 on the Bristol Stool Form Scale)
- •History of inflammatory bowel disease (includes Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, but does not include irritable bowel disease)
- •Unrepaired rectovaginal fistula/chronic 4th degree laceration
- •Full thickness rectal prolapse
- •History of congenital anorectal malformation
- •History of bowel resection surgery for any indication
- •Minor anal procedures within 6 months for treatment of ABL (injection of bulking agent or radiofrequency energy) or ligation of hemorrhoids
- •Prior pelvic or abdominal radiation
- •Diagnosis of cancer of the descending colon or anus
- •Diagnosis of cancer in the region where the PTNS or sham needles or surface electrodes would be placed
- •Pacemaker, implantable defibrillator
- •Current use of Interstim sacral nerve stimulator or TENS in the pelvic region, back, or legs
- •Clinically significant neurological disorders known to affect anal continence
- •Coagulopathy
- •Severe peripheral edema preventing accurate placement of PTNS needles
- •Chronic swollen, infected, inflamed skin or skin eruptions (e.g., phlebitis, thrombophlebitis, varicose veins) in the region where the PTNS or sham needles or surface electrodes would be placed
- •Metal implant in foot/toes near TENS electrode location
- •Marked sensory deficit (numbness) of feet or ankles in the region where the PTNS or sham needles or surface electrodes would be placed
- •Childbirth within the last 3 months
- •Pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the study duration 1 year; a urine pregnancy test will be performed and must be negative by the first intervention visit if the participant is of childbearing potential
- •Unwilling to use acceptable form of contraceptive if the participant is of childbearing potential
- •Participation in another intervention trial impacting bowel function
- •Inability to provide informed consent, complete questionnaires independently, or to attend intervention sessions
- •Unable or unwilling to complete the bowel diary in Run-In Phase (valid diary defined as data from ≥ 10 of 14 days with minimum of 3 consecutive days per week)
- •Unwilling to download bowel diary app onto smartphone if the participant owns a smartphone
- •Visual impairment prohibiting reading the paper diary, the smart phone screen
- •Unable to speak, read, or write in English or Spanish at a basic level
结局指标
主要结局
Change From Baseline St. Mark's (Vaizey) Score
时间窗: 4, 8, and 12 Weeks
The primary outcome measure is the change from baseline in St. Mark's (Vaizey) Score 12 weeks after treatment initiation to compare the outcomes of post-tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) versus sham stimulation. The St. Mark's (Vaizey) score, published in 1999, is commonly used in clinical studies and reports and was based on the Jorge-Wexner score but added two further items for assessment: the use of constipating medication and the presence of fecal urgency. Minimum score is 0 = perfect continence; maximum score is 24 = totally incontinent. Change from baseline is calculated as Week \[4, 8, or 12\] Score minus the score at baseline.
次要结局
- Change From Baseline Number of Fecal Incontinence Events Per Week(8 and 12 Weeks)
- Change From Baseline Number of Urge Fecal Incontinence Events Per Week(8 and 12 Weeks)
- 75% Improvement in Fecal Incontinence Episodes Per Week(8 and 12 Weeks)
- Change From Baseline Number of Urge Bowel Movements Per Week(8 and 12 Weeks)
- 50% Improvement in Fecal Incontinence Episodes Per Week(8 and 12 Weeks)
- Change From Baseline Number of Bowel Movements Per Week(8 and 12 Weeks)
- Change From Baseline Number of Days Without Fecal Incontinence Episodes Per Week(8 and 12 Weeks)
- Patient Global Impression-Improvement(4, 8, and 12 Weeks)
- Responder to Treatment(4, 8, and 12 Weeks)