Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01346189
NCT01346189
Completed
Not Applicable

A Randomized Trial of Behavioral Economic Interventions to Reduce CVD Risk

University of Pennsylvania3 sites in 1 country1,503 target enrollmentSeptember 2011

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Cardiovascular Disease
Sponsor
University of Pennsylvania
Enrollment
1503
Locations
3
Primary Endpoint
Change in LDL From Baseline to 12 Months
Status
Completed
Last Updated
8 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Using a 4-arm, cluster-randomized controlled trial, the investigators will test the effectiveness of different behavioral economic interventions in increasing statin use and reducing LDL cholesterol among patients with poor cholesterol control who are at very high risk for CVD. The investigators will test these approaches among primary care physicians and their patients at very high risk of CVD at Geisinger Health System and University of Pennsylvania outpatient clinics.

Detailed Description

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in the United States. Despite strong evidence that reducing low-density lipoproteins (LDL) with statins successfully lowers CVD risk, physicians under-prescribe statins, physicians fail to intensify treatment when indicated, and more than 50% of patients stop taking statins within one year of first prescription, though such therapy typically should be life-long. In this study, we will test the effectiveness of different behavioral economic interventions in increasing statin use and reducing LDL cholesterol among patients with poor cholesterol control who are at very high risk for CVD. The application of conceptual approaches from behavioral economics offers considerable promise in advancing health and health care. Pay for performance initiatives represent one such potential application, but one in which incorporating the underlying psychology of decision makers has not generally been done, and experimental tests have not been conducted. We will test these approaches among primary care physicians and their patients at very high risk of CVD at Geisinger Health System and University of Pennsylvania outpatient clinics. Using a 4-arm, cluster-randomized controlled trial, we aim to answer these questions: \[1\] How does the provision of provider incentives compare to the provision of patient incentives, to a combination of patient and provider incentives, or to no incentives at all? \[2\] Are results sustained after incentives and other interventions are withdrawn? \[3\] How do these approaches compare in implementation, acceptability, cost, and cost-effectiveness?

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
September 2011
End Date
August 2014
Last Updated
8 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Factorial
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Physicians: All primary care providers who have at least 5 patients who meet eligibility criteria will be eligible.
  • Patients: 10-year CVD risk of between 10-20% who do not have an LDL below 140 mg/dl or 10-year CVD risk of at least 20% (including those with preexisting CHD) who do not have an LDL below 120 mg/dl will be the primary inclusion criteria. We have chosen to include all patients meeting these inclusion criteria regardless of their reported adherence to statins, as there clearly is room for improvement in the LDL through a combination of physician and patient actions.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients will be excluded if they have a known allergy or history of side effects to statins, will not or cannot give consent, or have a markedly shortened life expectancy (diagnosis of metastatic cancer, end-stage renal disease on dialysis, or dementia).

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in LDL From Baseline to 12 Months

Time Frame: 12 months

Change in LDL-C levels (mg/dL)

Secondary Outcomes

  • Change in LDL From Baseline to 15 Months(15 months)

Study Sites (3)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials