ISRCTN93205640已完成不适用
Digital versus analogic chest drainage in pulmonary resection
REDAX S.r.l.0 个研究点目标入组 98 人开始时间: 2016年2月8日最近更新:
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 98
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •1. Aged 18 years or over
- •2. Pulmonary resection
- •3. Informed consent obtained
排除标准
- •1. Patients requiring pneumonectomy
- •2. Patients requiring surgery for pneumothorax
- •3. FEV1%<70%
- •4. FEV1/FVC<70%
- •5. Hepatic or renal insufficiency
- •6. Systemica autoimmune diseases
- •7. Chronic corticosteroids treatment
- •8. Patients requiring lung volume reduction surgery
- •9. Patients requiring sleeve lobectomy
研究者
相似试验
已完成
不适用
Digital Versus Analog Pleural Drainage Following Pulmonary ResectionPulmonary Air LeakLobectomyWedge ResectionSegmentectomyNCT01775657Ottawa Hospital Research Institute176
已完成
不适用
Digital Versus Analog Pleural Drainage in Patients With Pulmonary Air LeakPulmonary Air LeakNCT01566032Ottawa Hospital Research Institute30
已完成
不适用
Comparison of Pleural Drainage Systems on Reducing Pleural Effusion Formation Following Lung ResectionLung NeoplasmsPleural EffusionNCT01776372McMaster University103
撤回
不适用
Catheter ablation versus video assisted thoracoscopic surgery for the treatment of (longstanding) persistent atrial fibrillatio10007521Atrial fibrillationNL-OMON41871niversitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht60
尚未招募
不适用
The CAVIAR-trialPersistent and longstanding persistent atrial fibrillationNL-OMON20520niversity Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU)60