Electrocoagulation vs. Cold Knife Cutting in Joint Arthroplasty (Electrocoagulation vs Scalpel)
- Conditions
- Compassion
- Registration Number
- NCT06251869
- Lead Sponsor
- Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy
- Brief Summary
Comparison of clinical outcomes of electrocoagulation and non-electrocoagulation techniques in total hip and knee arthroplasty surgery
- Detailed Description
Objectives:
A. To evaluate the effectiveness of electrocoagulation:
* To measure the reduction in intraoperative bleeding volume when using electrocoagulation.
* Analyse the impact of electrocoagulation on surgical visibility and accuracy during implant placement.
B. Comparison of surgical outcomes:
* Investigate the incidence of intra- and postoperative complications, such as incidental vascular-nerve injury, wound infections, deep vein thrombosis, and implant-related problems, in patients operated on with electrocoagulation versus techniques without electrocoagulation.
* Examine the influence of haemostatic technique on the need for blood transfusion during or after surgery.
* Evaluation of long-term functional outcomes and patient satisfaction, including joint stability and range of motion, in both groups.
C. Review of patient recovery and period of hospitalization:
* Analysis of the impact of electrocoagulation on length of hospitalisation, and time to ambulation.
* Assessment of postoperative pain levels and analgesic medication use between the two groups.
* Patients' return to daily activities and overall quality of life after surgery.
D. Comparison of data obtained with other studies conducted internationally.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 700
- Patients who have given informed consent to the procedure
- Patients admitted over 18 years of age
- Patients with pathology requiring primary joint replacement (symptomatic gonarthrosis/coxarthrosis, Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head , femoral neck fractures, etc)
- Contraindications for major surgery or anaesthesia
- Patients with active infections that could interfere with outcome assessment
- Patients unable to give informed consent for psychological or cognitive reasons
- Severe medical conditions such as coagulopathies that may significantly influence outcomes
- Patients unable or unwilling to adhere to the required follow-up period
- Patients who died during the study period
- Patients with revision prosthesis operations
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) knee subjective score the test will be administered pre operation, 2 weeks post-operation, 6 weeks post-op, 3 months post-op, 6 months post-op, 1 year post-op to objectify the recovery, score is on a scale, higher values mean a worse outcome, scale 0-168
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) subjective score the test will be administered pre operation, 2 weeks post-operation, 6 weeks post-op, 3 months post-op, 6 months post-op, 1 year post-op to objectify the recovery, score is on a scale, higher values mean a worse outcome, scale 0-96 .
International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) objective form the test will be administered pre operation, 2 weeks post-operation, 6 weeks post-op, 3 months post-op, 6 months post-op, 1 year post-op to objectify the recovery, score has different classifications on a scale from A to D, the latter being the worse outcome .
Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS-JR) hip subjective score the test will be administered pre operation, 2 weeks post-operation, 6 weeks post-op, 3 months post-op, 6 months post-op, 1 year post-op to objectify the recovery, score is on a scale, higher values mean a worse outcome, scale 0-24 .
Harris Hip Score the test will be administered pre operation, 2 weeks post-operation, 6 weeks post-op, 3 months post-op, 6 months post-op, 1 year post-op to objectify the recovery, score is on a scale, higher values mean a better outcome, scale 0-100 .
Forgotten Joint Score the test will be administered 2 weeks post-operation, 6 weeks post-op, 3 months post-op, 6 months post-op, 1 year post-op to objectify the recovery, score is on a scale, higher values mean a worse outcome, scale 0-48 .
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method leucocyte levels the leucocyte levels will be registered pre-operation, then post-op day: 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. Then at 2 weeks post-operation, 6 weeks, and 3 months for infection objectification .
thrombocyte levels the thrombocyte levels will be registered pre-operation, then post-op day: 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. Then at 2 weeks post-operation, 6 weeks, and 3 months for blood loss objectification .
joint flexion angle the measurements will be registered pre-operative, then 2 weeks post-operation, 6 weeks post-op, 3 months post-op, 6 months post-op, 1 year post-op to objectify the recovery, the measurement will be done with a measuring angle during objective evaluation. .
mobilisation intervals of the patient through hospital stay of patient approximatively 4-7 days the investigators will asses the time for the self-mobilisation of the patient to sit at the bed's edge, and then mobilisation with a walking aid like a walking frame. .
joint hyperextension angle the measurements will be registered pre-operative, then 2 weeks post-operation, 6 weeks post-op, 3 months post-op, 6 months post-op, 1 year post-op to objectify the recovery, the measurement will be done with a measuring angle during objective evaluation. .
hemaglobin levels the hemaglobin levels will be registered pre-operation, then post-op day: 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. Then at 2 weeks post-operation, 6 weeks, and 3 months for blood loss objectification .
genu flexum angle the measurements will be registered pre-operative, then 2 weeks post-operation, 6 weeks post-op, 3 months post-op, 6 months post-op, 1 year post-op to objectify the recovery, the measurement will be done with a measuring angle during objective evaluation. .
joint internal rotation angle the measurements will be registered pre-operative, then 2 weeks post-operation, 6 weeks post-op, 3 months post-op, 6 months post-op, 1 year post-op to objectify the recovery, the measurement will be done with a measuring angle during objective evaluation. .
joint external rotation angle the measurements will be registered pre-operative, then 2 weeks post-operation, 6 weeks post-op, 3 months post-op, 6 months post-op, 1 year post-op to objectify the recovery, the measurement will be done with a measuring angle during objective evaluation. .
joint abduction angle the measurements will be registered pre-operative, then 2 weeks post-operation, 6 weeks post-op, 3 months post-op, 6 months post-op, 1 year post-op to objectify the recovery, the measurement will be done with a measuring angle during objective evaluation. .
Number of participants with complications through study completion, an average of 1 year to objectify the superiority of one technique over the other, higher number signifies a worse outcome .
joint adduction angle the measurements will be registered pre-operative, then 2 weeks post-operation, 6 weeks post-op, 3 months post-op, 6 months post-op, 1 year post-op to objectify the recovery, the measurement will be done with a measuring angle during objective evaluation. .
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Clinica Ortopedie-Traumatologie, Secția 2
🇷🇴Cluj-Napoca, Cluj, Romania
Clinica Ortopedie-Traumatologie, Secția 2🇷🇴Cluj-Napoca, Cluj, RomaniaBENEA R HOREA, MDPrincipal InvestigatorCICIO DENNIS, studentSub InvestigatorCIORNEI VLADIMIR, MDSub Investigator