跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05450640
NCT05450640已完成不适用

Evaluation of the Evolution of the Patient Care Pathway in the Context of the Implementation of the DOuBLE EMIcizumab Dispensing Circuit in France

Hospices Civils de Lyon1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 176 人开始时间: 2023年1月9日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
176
试验地点
1
主要终点
satisfaction levels reported through a specific questionnaire

研究概览

简要总结

Haemophilia A (HA) is a rare constitutional haemorrhagic disease whose drug management is based on the use of chronic lifelong replacement therapy. The occurrence of an inhibitor is a dreaded complication that impacts conventional management, consisting in using factor VIII (FVIII)-based replacement therapy, most often for prophylaxis. Although effective, these treatments can only be administered intravenously, leading to accessibility constraints and significant mental burden for patients and their relatives.

Before June 15, 2021 in France, the emicizumab (HEMLIBRA®) was available only in hospital pharmacies for the prevention or reduction of bleedings. The introduction of the dual dispensing circuit in hospital or community pharmacies, left to patient's choice, is effective from this date. These changes have important organizational consequences for patients and health professionals alongside the pathway of care. Therefore, the effectiveness of this new organization requires to be evaluated with a national French study, called PASO DOBLE DEMI. The aims of this study are twofold :

I. To evaluate the direct impact of the training programs provided to the new placeholders of the dispensing circuit ; the community pharmacists, II. To evaluate satisfaction of patients or their relatives regarding the emicizumab treatment whether they chose dispensing in the community pharmacy, or kept the dispensing at the hospital pharmacy.

The methodology was based on the 4-level of the Kirkpatrick's evaluation model; 1) the immediate reaction of community pharmacists following the trainings (Reaction), 2) their knowledge acquisition (Learning), 3) their professional practice (Behavior) and 4 ) the patients' satisfaction related to their treatment whether dispensing in hospital or in community pharmacies (Results).

The PASO DOBLE DEMI II study was based on the fourth level of the evaluation model and particularly to evaluate to what extent the dispensing of Emicizumab (HEMLIBRA ®) treatment in community pharmacies has contributed to the improvement of the satisfaction of patients with HA.

The availability of the treatment in community pharmacy assumes an improvement of the treatment accessibility for the patient at several levels :

  • Global accessibility: what choice has the patient expressed to access his treatment from a practical point of view?
  • Adaptation: Has the patient adapted to the new treatment delivery organization?
  • Availability of resources: are the special needs of the patients taken into consideration?
  • Social acceptability: is the patient willing to follow the proposed care pathway? The issue of treatment cost is not considered in this study because the cost of antihemophilic treatments is totally covered by the French government for all patients regardless of their insurance coverage

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Other
时间视角
Cross Sectional

入排标准

年龄范围
0 Years 至 —(Child, Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patient with hemophilia type A with or without inhibitors
  • Patients treated with Emicizumab (Hemlibra®)
  • Age over 18 years old or legal representative of a minor haemophilia type A patient or his/her relative/caregiver for a non-autonomous adult patient

排除标准

  • Patient under guardianship / curatorship
  • Opposition expressed to use personal data

结局指标

主要结局

satisfaction levels reported through a specific questionnaire

时间窗: 6 months

This questionnaire is composed of 40 questions for an estimated time to fulfil not exceeding 8 minutes. The overall satisfaction levels consists in collecting the patient's perception based on the 4-item of the Likert-scale (strongly dissatisfied, rather not satisfied, rather satisfied, strongly satisfied) taking into account the 4 dimensions of accessibility (global accessibility, adaptation, availability of resources, social acceptability).

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验