Vibration Anesthesia for Propofol- Rocuronium Injection Pain
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 52
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- preventing or reducing rocuronium injection pain
研究概览
简要总结
Despite numerous strategies for preventing or alleviating pain associated with propofol and rocuronium injections, it remains common and distressing for patients. Vibration is an effective method of reducing pain during facial cosmetic injections and some venipuncture procedures. But it has not been previously studied in the context of propofol or rocuronium injection pain. This randomized study aims to evaluate the effect of vibration anesthesia on the incidence and severity of propofol and rocuronium injection pain.
详细描述
Due to their rapid onset and short duration of action, ease of titration, recovery, and favorable profile for side effects, propofol and rocuronium are agents frequently used together in anesthesia practice and for rapid-sequence intubation. However, both cause severe discomfort due to pain in the injection arm. Some patients recall the induction of anesthesia as the most painful part of the perioperative period.
Vibration anesthesia has repeatedly been shown to alleviate pain sensation effectively and safely. Vibration anesthesia device is designed to reduce the pain from minor procedures, such as injection of medications, suture or staple removal, phlebotomy and even venipuncture pain in pediatric patients. The advantages of this device include its low cost, lack of adverse effects, and ease of use.
It has been shown to reduce pain with a mechanism based on the gate control theory, which states that vibrations stimulate the dorsal horn neurons, the sites at which pain signals are modulated and thus block full transmission of the pain.The investigators therefore proposed this randomized controlled study to compare the effectiveness of a vibration device for propofol and rocuronium injection pain during general anesthesia induction.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Prevention
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 65 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- Female
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •ASA I-II patients
- •Patients who are planned to undergo gynecology operations
排除标准
- •Participants who were pregnant,
- •Patients who had a recent history of a severe allergic or hypersensitivity reaction to propofol or rocuronium
研究组 & 干预措施
group Vibration
The participants who were chose an opaque envelope containing yellow paper represented the vibration group (Group V). After 1 min of pre-treatment with the vibration device on the intravenous catheter trace, we manually injected 2-2,5 mg/kg, 1% propofol (Propofol 1%, Fresenius 20 ml flacon, Germany) over 15 s. Observer rated the pain responses according to a four-point scale which developed by McCrirrick and Hunterand. Also asked the patients whether they had any discomfort. After the propofol injection, pain scores were observed during propofol injection and 20 seconds after the injection, and hemodynamic records were taken. 0,6 mg/kg rocuronium (Esmeron® 50 mg.5ml-1 N.V. Organon, Oss, Holland) were injected over 10 seconds. The movement response to rocuronium injection pain was evaluated by the same observer on a four-point scale (FPS) during and after 20 seconds rocuronium injection.
干预措施: vibration device , Beauty bar facial massaging device, T-Shape Electric Sign Face Massage Tools, Dangshan, China (Device)
group Control
The participants who were chose an opaque envelope containing red paper represented the group control (Group C).Only propofol and rocuronium were given to these patients. propofol injection made manually 2-2,5 mg/kg, 1% propofol (Propofol 1%, Fresenius 20 ml flacon, Germany) over 15 s. Patients were observed during and after the injection of propofol for 20 seconds. Observer rated the pain responses according to a four-point scale which developed by McCrirrick and Hunter. During the injection of propofol, we also asked the patients whether they had any discomfort. After the propofol injection for 20 seconds, pain scores were observed, and hemodynamic records were taken. 0,6 mg/kg rocuronium (Esmeron® 50 mg.5ml-1 N.V. Organon, Oss, Holland) were injected over 10 seconds. The movement response to rocuronium injection pain was evaluated by the same observer on a four-point scale (FPS) during and 20 seconds after the rocuronium injection.
结局指标
主要结局
preventing or reducing rocuronium injection pain
时间窗: patients were observed during and after the injection of rocuronium for 20 seconds by an observer
The movement response to rocuronium injection pain was evaluated by the same observer on a four-point scale (FPS). The scale was 0: no movement, 1: movement only the wrist, 2: movement of only the arm (elbow-shoulder) and, 3: general response, movement more than one extremity. 2 minutes after induction, intubation was completed.
preventing or reducing propofol injection pain
时间窗: patients were observed during and after the injection of propofol for 20 seconds by an observer
Observer rated the pain responses according to a four-point scale. After the injection of propofol to, we also asked the patients whether they had any discomfort.The severity of propofol- injection was evaluated using the following four-point pain response scale developed by McCrirrick and Hunter: level 0: (no pain) no verbal/ facial/ motor reaction to the injection; level 1: (mild pain) a minor verbal/ facial/ motor reaction to the injection but no physical activity or wrist joint movements; and level 2: (moderate pain), pain when asked by the anesthesiologist, or complaint of pain during the injection accompanied by physical activity- facial grimacing or withdrawal of the arm (elbow-shoulder); and level 3: (sever pain), a response accompanied by a facial expression of pain, or a strong vocal response, tears, arm withdrawal, and full body reaction ( including other body movements)
次要结局
未报告次要终点