MedPath

Effect of Multisensory Stimulation on Upper Extremity Motor Recovery in Stroke Patient: a Preliminary Testing

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Stroke
Interventions
Other: Conventional training
Other: Multisensory therapy
Registration Number
NCT03094377
Lead Sponsor
Tung Wah College
Brief Summary

Despite the advances in stroke rehabilitation, post-stroke upper extremity impairment is still a major challenge. Increasing evidence can be found supporting stimulation of the afferent receptor enhances neuroplasticity in the brain. Studies have suggested multisensory stimulation could promote motor learning by re-establishing the disrupted sensorimotor loop due to stroke and enhance neuroplasticity.

The objective of the study was to examine the effect of multisensory stimulation on upper-extremity motor recovery and self-care function in stroke patients.

Detailed Description

Stroke patients referred to occupational therapy division of geriatric day hospital will be recruited and randomly assigned to a multisensory therapy group or a conventional training group. The Multisensory therapy group received 12 weeks (two sessions/ week; 90 minutes/session) training. Each session began with 15 minutes of sensory stimulation (cold and vibration), 45 minutes of motor training and 30 minutes of self-care training. The conventional training group included 12 weeks (two sessions/ week; 90 minutes/session) training. Each session included 60 minutes of upper extremity motor practice and 30 minutes of self-care training.

Outcome measures included: Brunnstrom's stage, Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale and Functional Test for the Hemiplegic Upper Extremity were used for upper limb motor control and function; and Manual muscle testing was used for muscle strength. The modified Barthel Index was used for self-care performance

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
12
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria
  • Skin conditions/ injuries over the stimulation application areas
  • Contraindication for cold or vibration application
  • Speech disorder or global aphasia
  • Musculoskeletal or cardiac disorders
  • Other neurological conditions
  • History of diabetes or sensory impairment attributable to peripheral vascular disease or neuropathy

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Conventional training groupConventional trainingThe conventional training (CT) group included 12 weeks (two sessions/ week; 90 minutes/session) training conducted by an occupational therapist. Each session included 60 minutes of upper extremity motor practice (same as in MT group) and 30 minutes of self-care training (same as in MT group).
Multisensory therapy groupMultisensory therapyThe Multisensory therapy (MT) group received a 12-weeks (two sessions/ week; 90 minutes/session) training conducted by an occupational therapist. Each session began with 15 minutes of sensory stimulation (cold and vibration), 45 minutes of motor training and 30 minutes of self-care training.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change from baseline Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery at 3 monthsBaseline and post intervention at week 12

The Fugl-Meyer Assessment was used to assess the progress in synergistic and voluntary movement at baseline and post intervention.

Change from baseline Functional Test for the Hemiplegic Upper Extremity at 3 monthsBaseline and post intervention at week 12

The Functional Test for the Hemiplegic Upper Extremity was used to evaluate the recovery of the hemiplegic upper extremity functions at baseline and post intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change from baseline Manual Muscle testing at 3 monthsBaseline and post intervention at week 12

Manual muscle testing (MMT) was used for the evaluation of the motor recovery and strength of upper extremity muscle groups at baseline and post intervention.

Change from baseline Modified Barthel Index at 3 monthsBaseline and post intervention at week 12

The Modified Barthel Index was used to measure functional performance in basic activities of daily living at baseline and post intervention.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Wong Tai Sin Hospital

🇭🇰

Wong Tai Sin, Hong Kong

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath