LAAO With DAPT Versus Antithrombotic Therapy
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery DiseaseAtrial Fibrillation
- Interventions
- Procedure: ACP or Watchman
- Registration Number
- NCT03310801
- Lead Sponsor
- Korea University Anam Hospital
- Brief Summary
This study will retrospectively review and compare clinical outcomes between left atrial appendage occlusion with dual antiplatelet therapy versus conventional antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation.
- Detailed Description
Composite of stroke and major bleeding will be compared after adjusting those groups using inverse probability weighted model.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 480
- patients with AF who underwent PCI and treated with LAAO and DAPT or conventional antithrombotic therapy
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description LAAO with DAPT ACP or Watchman patients with AF who underwent PCI and treated with LAAO(either ACP or Watchman) and DAPT
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Composite of stroke and major bleeding From date of index procedure until the date of primary endpoint occur or date of last follow up, whichever came first, assessed up to 50 months Primary endpoint is a composite of stroke and major bleeding. Stroke is defined as ischemic cerebrovascular event included both transient ischemic attack and ischemic cerebral infarction. Major bleeding event was defined as moderate or severe bleeding according to the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries criteria.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method