Investigation of Synbiotic Treatment in NAFLD

Not Applicable

Completed

Conditions: Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Interventions: Dietary Supplement: Maltodextrin
Dietary Supplement: Synbiotic

Registration Number: NCT01680640

Lead Sponsor: University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust

Brief Summary: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a liver condition in which fat builds up in the liver not caused by alcohol. The liver is an organ that is not designed to build up fat. NAFLD is common in people who have too much body fat in their abdomen or who have diabetes (high blood sugar), but does not always exist with these conditions. NAFLD can also occur in thin people too. NAFLD can be harmful to the liver and may cause the liver to fail over time. NAFLD may also cause adult (or type 2) diabetes and also heart disease. In people who already have diabetes, NAFLD can cause glucose (sugar) levels to be too high.

Our intestines (guts) contain healthy bacteria and some harmful bacteria (bugs). This balance of healthy and harmful bugs is essential for the normal workings of our intestine to digest food. Providing these bacteria do not leak out into the blood they do not cause harm. If the balance of healthy to harmful bugs is upset, the harmful can cause problems and leak out into the blood. Because the liver is connected to the intestine by blood vessels the harmful bacteria can get to the liver and cause problems. These bacteria can cause the liver and the body to build up too much fat and might cause NAFLD and obesity. In this study, we will test the effects of a supplement (synbiotic) taken during the day, that contains a mixture of 'good' healthy bacteria (probiotic) and a sugar (prebiotic) that is not broken down and absorbed into the blood. We will test whether the synbiotic supplement has beneficial effects on the NAFLD liver condition and on factors linked to too much body fat, diabetes and heart disease.

Detailed Description: We will recruit people with NAFLD who have been diagnosed as part of their NHS (National Health Service) care with having this condition. At present there is no treatment for this condition.

Purpose and design:

We are asking the research question: "Does the modulation of gut microflora with a synbiotic improve non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and the related risk factors for heart disease and type 2 diabetes?"

Presently there is no treatment for this liver condition. Research evidence suggests that a synbiotic supplement might be beneficial for this condition.

To address this research question we want to undertake a randomised double blind placebo controlled trial recruiting people who have been diagnosed with NAFLD.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: COMPLETED

Sex: All

Target Recruitment: 104

Inclusion Criteria

Both men and women
Age > 18 years
Liver fat diagnosed on normal clinical grounds including in most cases liver assessed by Kleiner scoring system to classify severity, with no known aetiological factors for underlying liver disease (e.g. exclusion of hepatitis A, B & C, primary biliary cirrhosis, autoimmune hepatitis, haemochromatosis). Last liver biopsy will be within 3 years of recruitment to the study.
Liver fat diagnosed by ultrasound, CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients who also have either diabetes and/or features of the metabolic syndrome, without evidence of known aetiological factors for underlying liver disease (e.g. exclusion of hepatitis A, B & C, primary biliary cirrhosis, autoimmune hepatitis, haemochromatosis).
Alcohol consumption ≤ 14 units / week for women ≤ 21 units / week for men.

Exclusion Criteria

Alcohol consumption > 15 units /week for women and > 22 units /week for men.
Decompensated acute or chronic liver disease.
A history of viral hepatitis, diarrhoea, diverticulosis, irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel diseases, coeliac disease (seropositivity for anti-endomysial immunoglobulin A antibodies; immunoglobulin A (IgA) EMA).
Previous bariatric or other abdominal surgery.
Continuous use of antibiotics that may change gut microflora, probiotics, or antisecretory drugs capable of causing achlorhydria within the 2 months preceding enrolment, or evidence of immunoglobulin A or immunoglobulin deficiency (both of which produce confounding effects during assessments of intestinal permeability and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth).

Study & Design

Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Maltodextrin	Maltodextrin	4 grams of maltodextrin daily.
Synbiotic	Synbiotic	Fructo-oligosacharide with a degree of polymerization \< 10 at 4 g/twice a day (two sticks a day) plus Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis (BB-12) as minimum of 10 billion colony forming unit (CFU)/day (1 capsule a day).

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Change in Liver Fat	baseline and 12 months	Change in liver fat percent was calculated as the percent liver fat at the end of the study, minus the percent of liver fat prior to the intervention. Change in liver fat percent ranged from -60.6% (good) to + 33.7% (bad).
Change in Enhanced Liver Fibrosis Score (ELF)	baseline and 12 months	Change in Enhanced Liver Fibrosis score (ELF) was calculated as ELF score at the end of the study minus ELF score prior to the intervention (at baseline). A decrease in the ELF score was considered good as it reflected a decrease in liver fibrosis, and an increase in ELF score was considered bad as it reflected an increase in liver fibrosis. Change in ELF scores ranged from -0.56 (good) to + 0.68 (bad).
Change in NAFLD Fibrosis Score	baseline and 12 months	Change in NAFLD Fibrosis Score (NFS) was calculated as the NFS score at the end of the study, minus NFS score prior to the intervention (at baseline). A decrease in the NFS score was considered good because it reflected a decrease in liver fibrosis, and an increase in NFS score was considered bad, as it reflected an increase in liver fibrosis. Change in NFS scores ranged from -2.07 (good) to + 1.75 (bad)
Change in Bifidobacterium Spp.	baseline and 12 months	The change in percent of Bifidobacteria spp was computed as the percent of Bifidobactera spp at the end of the study minus the percent of Bifidobacteria prior to the intervention (at baseline). A positive change in percent (e.g +0.1 to 7.0%) in Bifidobacteria spp. was considered good and a negative change in percent (e.g. -0.1 to -0.5%) in Bifidobacteria spp. considered bad. (Minimum = -0.5% (bad) and Maximum = +7.0% (good)).