Comparison of Blind technique with under Vision technique of placement of airway tubes(LMA) in children.
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2019/02/017644
- Lead Sponsor
- nil
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 75
Inclusion Criteria
pediatric patients,6 months TO 12 YEAR, ASA 1-2,both male & female, receiving general anesthesia with laryngeal mask airway(LMA).
Exclusion Criteria
1 Oropharyngeal or laryngeal pathology
2.Upper respiratory tract infections on the day of surgery (i.e. cough, fever, rhinorrhea)
3.Anticipated difficult airway
4.Children at risk of aspiration (i.e. Gastrointestinal reflux disease)
5.Hiatus hernia, Lung diseases
6.Cardiorespiratory or cerebrovascular diseases
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Comparison of malposition in Blind technique with Direct and Video laryngoscope guided Laryngeal mask airway insertion techniques in pediatric population with Flexible bronchoscopic assessment.Timepoint: After LMA placement, following induction of general anesthesia.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1.Number attempts for successful insertion <br/ ><br>2.Time taken for insertion <br/ ><br>3.Hemodynamic changes during insertion. <br/ ><br>4.Oropharyngeal leak pressure <br/ ><br>5.Complications during the insertion- airway injury, laryngospasm, desaturation (SpO290%). <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 1.Induction of general anesthesia and insertion of LMA. <br/ ><br>2.Time from placement of LMA to successful placement <br/ ><br>3.Till 5 minutes after placement of LMA. <br/ ><br>4.After placement of LMA and initiation of mechanical ventilation. <br/ ><br>5.At the completion of surgery and removal of LMA. <br/ ><br>