A Comparative study of conventional Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy vs Modified Sagittal Split Osteotomy requiring mandibular advancement or setback in skeletal malocclusion cases
试验速览
- 阶段
- 3 期
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 10
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Stability of mandibular advancement and or setback
研究概览
简要总结
Rationale behind the study is to evaluate the safety, and outcomes of these two surgical techniques. This study aim to determine which approach offers better results in terms of postoperative stability, functional outcomes and complications. Additionally, comparative studies help identify any advantages or disadvantages associated with each technique, aiding surgeons in making informed decisions about the most appropriate surgical approach for individual patients.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 50.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Cases with skeletal malocclusion requiring BSSO advancement or setback
- •Patients above 18 years of age and below 40 years of age.
排除标准
- •History of Previous Orthognathic surgery
- •Immunocompromised patients.
- •Patients with other systemic conditions contraindicated for surgery.
- •Pregnancy or lactation
- •Severe TMJ disorder.
结局指标
主要结局
Stability of mandibular advancement and or setback
时间窗: One week, three weeks and 6 weeks postoperatively
Complication rates
时间窗: One week, three weeks and 6 weeks postoperatively
Functional outcome
时间窗: One week, three weeks and 6 weeks postoperatively
Radiographic assessment
时间窗: One week, three weeks and 6 weeks postoperatively
次要结局
- 1. Balanced appearance of face(2. Improved breathing, chewing & swallowing functions)
研究者
Dr Harshni B
Sree Balaji dental college and hospital