NCT00732550已完成不适用
Comparison of Single Trocar Cholecystectomy to Standard Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 50
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- To assess the safety and efficacy of a novel approach to minimally invasive surgery techniques.
研究概览
简要总结
The purpose of this study is to determine the advantages of single trocar cholecystectomy over standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Non Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 60 Years（Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Age 18-60
- •symptomatic cholelithiasis
排除标准
- •pregnancy
- •morbid obesity with BMI>35
- •other gallbladder pathology like polyps or tumor
- •history of upper abdomen laparotomy
- •suspected choledocholithiasis
结局指标
主要结局
To assess the safety and efficacy of a novel approach to minimally invasive surgery techniques.
时间窗: Continuous
次要结局
- To assess pain associated with the single trocar approach(Continuous)
- To assess scar formation associated with single trocar approach(Continuous)
研究者
研究点 (1)
Loading locations...
相似试验
已完成
不适用
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) Versus Laparoscopic CholecystectomyCholelithiasisBiliary DyskinesiaNCT00981604Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City60
终止
不适用
Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Traditional Laparoscopic CholecystectomyCholelithiasisGallstonesCholecystitisBiliary DyskinesiaNCT01195285Saint Luke's Health System87
已完成
不适用
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs. needlescopic cholecystectomy; which is better for both surgeons and patients?JPRN-UMIN000022357Morioka Municipal Hospital Department of Surgery100
已完成
不适用
Safety and Cost-effectiveness Study of Single Port Laparoscopic CholecystectomiesCholecystolithiasisNCT00974194University of Lausanne Hospitals268
已完成
不适用
Quality of Life Measures After Single Access Vs Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Prospective Randomized Study.Evidence of CholecystectomyNCT01412996Mansoura University250