NCT02570269
Completed
Not Applicable
Prospective Randomized Comparison Between a Flexible Fiberoptic Intubation Via the Ambu® Aura Gain™ Airway and the Slotted Guedel Tubus in Terms of Time to a Completed Airway Management and Patient Safety.
ConditionsAdverse Anesthesia Outcome
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Adverse Anesthesia Outcome
- Sponsor
- Schulthess Klinik
- Enrollment
- 94
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Intubation time
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 7 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The study has to show that an intubation with the AuraGain Laryngeal mask could bring the same benefits in terms of intubation in clinical practice, as the slotted Guedel tubus.
Investigators
Berthold Moser
Principal Investigator
Schulthess Klinik
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Surgery of the shoulder, elbow, hand, hip, knee or foot
- •Signed consent form
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients with expected difficulties regarding to the intubation
- •Patients with diseases / anatomical changes in the area of the pharynx, the larynx, the trachea, the esophagus or the stomach
- •Not sober
- •Increased risk of aspiration
- •BMI \> 35 kg/m2
- •Acute disease which could affect the suitability of the anesthesia
- •Patients in which the use of a laryngeal mask is contraindicated or otherwise not possible
- •Patients with a disease which prevents an accurate examination of the patients (eg neuromuscular, mentally, metabolic disease)
- •Drug abuse in the recent past
- •Legal incompetence
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Intubation time
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Time to complete the Intubation in seconds
Secondary Outcomes
- Esophagal Intubation attempts(Intraoperative)
- Pain after Intubation as assessed by a Numeric Rating Scale(Intraoperative/2h postoperative/24h postoperative)
- AE/Complications(Intraoperative/postoperative until 24h)
- Intubation attempts(Intraoperative)
- Position of the mask as assessed by the Brimacombe Score(Intraoperative)
- Resistance measurement of the Insertion as assessed by a four point scoring system(Intraoperative)
Study Sites (1)
Loading locations...
Similar Trials
Completed
Not Applicable
A Comparison of the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Proseal and LMA Supreme in ChildrenChildrenNCT01449656Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago60
Completed
Not Applicable
A Comparison of the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) - Unique and LMA-Supreme in ChildrenLaryngeal Mask Airway in ChildrenNCT01653795Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago180
Completed
Not Applicable
A Comparison of the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Supreme and I-gel in ChildrenLaryngeal Masks in ChildrenNCT01633073Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago170
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison Between Three Supraglottic Airway Devices ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway, Air-Q LMA and Ambu AuraGainProseal LMA vs Air-Q LMA vs Ambu AurGain LMANCT04045899Dr.Mahak Mehta150
Completed
Not Applicable
Ambu®AuraGain™ Versus I-gel® in Obese PatientsObeseNCT03110393Schulthess Klinik44