Comparison Between 4 Different Nasal Dilators
- Conditions
- Incompetence of Nasal Valve
- Interventions
- Device: Nasal dilator AirmaxDevice: Nasal dilator NasanitaDevice: Nasal dilator Breath RightDevice: Nasal dilator Nozovent
- Registration Number
- NCT02196389
- Lead Sponsor
- Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
- Brief Summary
Several nasal dilators are currently commercially available, and can be applied endonasally (Airmax°, Nozovent and Nasanita°) or externally (Breath Right°). An objective comparison between these dilators has not been made so far, and would help the clinicians to advise the use of any of these dilators. From clinical experience, endonasal dilators are well supported and improve breathing better than the external dilators
- Detailed Description
Several nasal dilators are currently commercially available, and can be applied endonasally (Airmax°, Nozovent and Nasanita°) or externally (Breath Right°). An objective comparison between these dilators has not been made so far,
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 100
Patients with nasal obstruction due to external nasal valve problems and with positive Cottle sign.
Age > 18 and < 60 years. Ability to give reliable information and written informed consent.
Patients with nasal obstruction due to other endonasal anatomic deformities besides external nasal valve dysfunction.
Patients with rhinosinusitis and/or nasal polyps evaluated by nasal endoscopy. Patients with chronic lower airway disease like severe asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), bronchiectasis and/or other conditions that interfere with the generation of a reliable Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF) result.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Airmax Nasal dilator Airmax Nasal Dilator Nasanita Nasal dilator Nasanita Nasal Dilator Breath Right Nasal dilator Breath Right Nasal Dilator Nozovent Nasal dilator Nozovent Nasal Dilator
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Peak Nasal Inflammatory Flow 4 weeks Change in Peak Nasal Inflammatory Flow between the 4 different dilators
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method preference 4 weeks Patients' preference of 2 out of 4 dilators tested at baseline for a trial period of 4 week duration.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
UZ Leuven
🇧🇪Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium