Comparison of three options to correct backwardly placed lower jaw
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: K088- Other specified disorders of teethand supporting structures
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2020/04/024725
- Lead Sponsor
- Abhiram Cherukuri
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 30
Inclusion Criteria
Skeletal Class II malocclusion (ANB > 4â?°)
Retrognathic Mandible with positive VTO
Age group: 10 to 16 years.
Bilateral Class II molar relationship - half cusp or full cusp
Developmental age - Cervical Vertebra Stage and MP3 stage around the adolescent growth spurt.
Exclusion Criteria
Previous history of Orthodontic treatment
Angles Class II Division 1 Subdivision Malocclusion
Angles Class II Division 2 Malocclusion
Congenitally missing teeth (excluding third molars)
Syndromic or craniofacial anomalies
Severe facial asymmetry
Systemic diseases that may affect the orthodontic treatment results
Poor Oral Hygiene
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To cephalometrically analyse the skeletal, dental and soft tissue effects of Uniblock functional appliance in the treatment of growing patients with Skeletal Class II Division 1 malocclusion prospectively. <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 6 months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the effects of Uniblock Functional Appliance with those of Twin Block and Advansync2 appliance. (Both the samples of Twin Block and AdvanSync2 will be taken from a prospective study planned previously in the department.) <br/ ><br>A Patient Centred Outcome: Numerical Rating Scale to gather information on the patient�s perception of the appliance, directed at the effect of the appliance on pain, discomfort,speaking and eating. <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 6 months