MedPath

The Effect of Hysterotomy Technique on the Rate of Large Defects in the Hysterotomy Scar

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Scars
Interventions
Procedure: hysterotomy at cesarean
Registration Number
NCT01091181
Lead Sponsor
Region Skane
Brief Summary

The Effect of Cesarean Operative Technique on the Occurrence of Large Hysterotomy Scar Defects.

Detailed Description

Having a Caesarean leads to a scar in the uterus, which does not always heal properly. Defective healing can lead to serious complications in the next pregnancy and delivery. Different surgical techniques can be used for a Caesarean section.

The aim is to compare two surgical techniques (different ways of opening the uterus), to investigate whether one or the other technique leads to fewer defective scars in the uterus. Both these techniques are in use at the clinic. After the operation, patients are cared for in the normal way.

Six months after the Caesarean, patients are examined using vaginal ultrasound. Vaginal ultrasound allows to see if the scar after the Caesarean has healed well, or if there are defects in it.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
122
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
low incision grouphysterotomy at cesareanhysterotomy at cesarean performed 2 cm below plica vesicouterina
high incision grouphysterotomy at cesareanhysterotomy at cesarean performed 2 cm above plica vesicouterina
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
large defect6 months

occurrence of large defects in uterine cesarean scar are detected by ultrasound and are assessed by the percentage of patients who have large defects in uterine cesarean scar

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
uterina rupture/uterine dehiscenceup to 8 years

occurrence of uterine rupture/uterine dehiscence in subsequent labour is assessed by the percentage of patients who have uterine rupture/uterine dehiscence in subsequent labour

scar pregnancyup to 8 years

occurrence of scar pregnancy in subsequent pregnancy is assessed by the percentage of patients who have scar pregnancy after the index caesarean

difficulties at delivery of fetus1 hour

difficulties at delivery of fetus at caesarean are assessed by the percentage of patients when surgeons experience difficulties at delivery of fetus at caesarean

readmission to the hospital8 weeks

readmission to the hospital due to need of re-operation is assessed by the percentage of patients who have re-operation after caesarean

miscarriageup to 8 years

occurrence of miscarriage in subsequent pregnancy is assessed by the percentage of patients who have miscarriages in subsequent pregnancy

placenta previa/accretaup to 8 years

occurrence of placenta previa/accreta in subsequent pregnancy is assessed by the percentage of patients who have placenta previa/accreta in subsequent pregnancy

APGAR score1 and 5 minute after delivery

APGAR score measured at 1 and 5 minute after delivery. The five criteria are summarized using words chosen to form a backronym (Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, Respiration).The Apgar scale is determined by evaluating the newborn baby on five simple criteria on a scale from zero to two, then summing up the five values thus obtained. The resulting Apgar score ranges from zero to 10.

blood loss1 hour

estimated blood loss during surgery is measured in terms of mL

postoperative infection8 weeks

postoperative infection after caesarean section is assessed by the percentage of patients who develop this complication

vaginal delivery after caesareanup to 8 years

success rate of vaginal delivery after caesarean is assessed by the percentage of patients who delivered vaginally after the index caesarean

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Skåne University Hospital Malmö

🇸🇪

Malmö, Sweden

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath