跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2016/03/006776
CTRI/2016/03/006776已完成4 期

A randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, multicentre, parallel-group, safety and efficacy study comparing two ipratropium bromide/salbutamol sulphate (20 ï?­g/100 ï?­g per actuation) formulations delivered by pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) (ipratropium bromide/salbutamol sulphate CFC pMDI vs. ipratropium bromide/salbutamol sulphate HFA pMDI), administered for 12 weeks in adult patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Cipla Ltd0 个研究点目标入组 290 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
已完成
发起方
Cipla Ltd
入组人数
290

研究概览

简要总结

暂无简介。

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional

入排标准

入选标准

  • Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COPD according to the Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease criteria who required regular treatment with both ipratropium bromide and salbutamol sulphate and were well controlled on the combination product and did not require additional β2-agonists as regular therapy. Study patients could be current smokers or ex-smokers. Eligible patients also demonstrated forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) greater than or equal to 50 percent of the predicted value and had an FEV1/FVC ratio prebronchodilator <70%. All patients gave written, informed consent.

排除标准

  • Patients were excluded from the study if they had a history of asthma, allergic rhinitis or atopy. Patients were also excluded if they had received hospital treatment for acute exacerbation or had other evidence of an acute exacerbation of COPD or if they had received systemic corticosteroids within 4 weeks of the screening visit. Other reasons for exclusion included any serious uncontrolled medical condition or clinically relevant condition or findings at screening that might have compromised the safety of the patients or that might have interfered with the study findings. Patient were also excluded if they were allergic to soyabean or peanuts.

研究者

发起方
Cipla Ltd

相似试验

进行中(未招募)
1 期
A randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, multicentre, phase III, non inferiority trial of an oral mesalazine formulation in patients with active mild to moderate ulcerative colitis for the induction of remission.
CTIS2023-509606-30-00Faes Farma S.A.502
已完成
4 期
A clinical trial to compare the efficacy and safety of two formulations of inhaled ipratropium bromide in patients chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
CTRI/2015/05/005793Cipla Ltd395
进行中(未招募)
1 期
A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter, parallel group study to compare the tolerability and efficacy of once daily vardenafil versus vardenafil PRN versus placebo in men immediately after nerve-sparing prostatectomy for improving erectile function - REINVENT (Recovery of Erection: Intervention with Vardenafil Early Nightly Therapy)MedDRA version: 8.1Level: LLTClassification code 10061461Term: Erectile dysfunctionErectile Dysfunction
EUCTR2004-002172-42-GBBayer Healthcare AG
进行中(未招募)
不适用
A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter, parallel group study to compare the tolerability and efficacy of once daily vardenafil versus vardenafil PRN versus placebo in men immediately after nerve-sparing prostatectomy for improving erectile functioErectile Dysfunction
EUCTR2004-002172-42-ITBAYER
进行中(未招募)
不适用
A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter, parallel group study to compare the tolerability and efficacy of once daily vardenafil versus vardenafil PRN versus placebo in men immediately after nerve-sparing prostatectomy for improving erectile function - REINVENT (Recovery of Erection: Intervention with Vardenafil Early Nightly Therapy)MedDRA version: 8.1Level: LLTClassification code 10061461Term: Erectile dysfunctionErectile Dysfunction
EUCTR2004-002172-42-DEBayer Healthcare AG1,000