Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00343824
NCT00343824CompletedNot Applicable

Bacterial Control in Partial Thickness Burns Using Silver-containing Wound Dressings

University Hospital, Ghent1 site in 1 country100 target enrollmentStarted: November 1, 2006Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
100
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Evaluation of the efficacy of both wound dressings in controlling wound bioburden over a period of 21 days

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This study is to compare the treatment with two different silver-containing wound dressings: aquacel AG hydrofiber versus acticoat burn dressing.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Single Group
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
— to 80 Years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Burn wounds with flux values, measured by Laser Doppler Imaging, corresponding with expected healing time between 7 and 21 days, flux values between 200 and 1000 (red-pink or pink-yellow-green colour)
  • •Wounds treated with a hydrocolloid paste prior to LDI
  • •Possibility to follow the complete treatment schedule until wound healing and participation on complete follow-up schedule
  • •Informed consent
  • •Partial thickness burns with TBSE < 40%

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Mean flux values < 200 or > 1000
  • •TBSA > 40%
  • •Impossibility to debride necrotic skin prior to LDI measurement
  • •Wounds treated with any topical ointments or dressings other than hydrocolloid prior to LDI
  • •Not following the complete treatment schedule or missing some evaluations during the follow-up period
  • •Patient has any condition that seriously compromises the patient's ability to complete the study
  • •Patient has participated in another study using an investigational drug within the previous 30 days
  • •Patient has one or more medical condition(s)that in the opinion of the investigator would make the patient an inappropriate candidate for this study
  • •The plastic surgeon decides that surgery is necessary due to unusual circumstances
  • •Patient wish to decline from the study
  • •No informed consent
  • •Full thickness burns

Arms & Interventions

aquacel AG hydrofiber

Experimental

Intervention: aquacel AG hydrofiber versus acticoat burn dressing (Procedure)

Acticoat burn dressing

Experimental

Intervention: aquacel AG hydrofiber versus acticoat burn dressing (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Evaluation of the efficacy of both wound dressings in controlling wound bioburden over a period of 21 days

Time Frame: Over a period of 21 days

Secondary Outcomes

  • Cost-effectiveness(Once after wound closure.)
  • Comparison of blood silver levels(Every week until woundhealing. In folluw-up: at 3, 6 and 12 months)
  • Scar quality assessment(At 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after wound closure)
  • Percentage of genetically-acquired resistance to silver(Once after wound closure.)
  • Health related quality of life(At 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after wound closure)
  • Healing time comparison(Every 3 days until healing)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials