Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03436537
NCT03436537
Completed
Not Applicable

Development and Validation of the Periodontal Aesthetic Perception Scale in Patients With Periodontal Problems

Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University1 site in 1 country100 target enrollmentJanuary 2, 2017

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Gingival Enlargement
Sponsor
Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University
Enrollment
100
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Validity of PAPS
Status
Completed
Last Updated
8 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Aesthetics for individuals become increasingly important, while the aesthetic effects of periodontal disease is an important issue that should be assessed by the patient's perception.

The results demonstrate that the periodontal aesthetic perception scale showed reliable and valid scores in healthy controls and periodontal patients.

The periodontal aesthetic perception scale may be an appropriate tool to assess periodontal esthetic in clinical and research settings.

Detailed Description

Aim: The aim of this study is to develop and validate a periodontal aesthetic specific tool to assess aesthetic conditions perceived by patients with periodontal problems. Methods: With patient interviews were identified a total of 22 statements that describe the non-aesthetic gingival appearance. These 22 items were reviewed by the dentists and then Periodontologists and the number of items in the survey was reduced to 7. Subsequently, three groups of patients were included in the study: Gingival recession (GR) group, gingival enlargement (GE) group and periodontal healthy (H) group. Consequently, the validity and reliability of the periodontal aesthetic perception scale (PAPS) were examined. Results: According to the results of the Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), 1 item was removed from the scale. The final 6-item questionnaire was shown to have a two-domain structure. Cronbach's alpha for the whole scale was .766. The interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) values were between 0.98 and 1.00, demonstrating excellent agreement. Overall, these findings indicated that the PAPS has good reliability. Conclusion: This reliable, valid and short questionnaire specific to aesthetic conditions perceived by patients with periodontal problems may serve as a valued instrument in future clinical trials.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
January 2, 2017
End Date
December 1, 2017
Last Updated
8 years ago
Study Type
Observational
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Ozge Gokturk

asst. assoc.

Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Validity of PAPS

Time Frame: 6 months

The KMO (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin) test produced a value of 0.80, which was greater than the recommended threshold value of 0.50.

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials