A Multicentre Mixed method study to elaborate the concerns amongst Anesthesia faculty pertaining to students’ research.
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 入组人数
- 150
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- To understand the prevailing apprehension in the faculty while guiding the trainees for the thesis.
研究概览
简要总结
This is a study on the issues faced by the Anesthesia Faculty while guiding students conduct their thesis. Research plays a very important role in a student’s education. Research is nothing but an in depth study of materials and deducing facts. It is important for students because it not only helps in learning but also in decision making. Therefore, it increases self confidence, making them better doctors. Teachers help in laying a strong foundation of the research methodology for students. They can have an impact on students’ perspective of research. They make sure that the research follows basic manners of originality & honesty. Teaching students the correct way to conduct research is a big responsibility for the research supervisors. Supervisors handle not only work but also have an individual life. Anesthesia as a specialty can be exhausting due to the vigilance required while handling patients and the long working hours. The emotional exhaustion seen in the Anesthesia program directors is higher than other medical specialties. The stress that comes with research is an additional burden for the faculty. There is enough study describing the stresses faced by the students while conducting research. It is essential to understand if the Anesthesiology faculty is able to handle this additional burden. Through this survey we plan to reach out nationwide faculty willing to participate and understand their concerns and suggestions to improve student and anesthesia guide relationship
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 30.00 Year(s) 至 80.00 Year(s)(—)
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •All the Anesthesia faculty who have/ are supervising thesis of students
- •Those who have consented for the survey (implied consent in the survey questionnaire)
- •Those who have signed a written consent for in-depth interviews.
排除标准
- •Refusal to participate
- •Non-consented participants.
结局指标
主要结局
To understand the prevailing apprehension in the faculty while guiding the trainees for the thesis.
时间窗: During or after guiding students in research.
次要结局
- 1. Influence of the work environment on the hardships faced by the guides(2. Impact of these concerns on the well-being of the guide)
研究者
Dr Sumitra G Bakshi
Tata Memorial Centre
