The Effect of Humeral Head Depressor Muscle Co-Activation Training in Terms of Functional Outcomes

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Surgery; Rotator Cuff Tears
• Interventions: Other: Control Group; Other: Humeral Head Depressor Muscle Co-Activation Training- Experimental Group

• Registration Number: NCT04154592
• Lead Sponsor: Hacettepe University

Brief Summary

Recent systematic reviews, and meta-analyses concluded that rotator cuff and scapular strengthening exercises should be included in rehabilitation programs for patients with middle-size rotator cuff muscle tear. Superior translation of the humeral head is one of the factors adversely affecting this rehabilitation process. Aside from rotator cuff muscles, opposition of superior humeral head translation can be achieved by the glenohumeral adductors (i.e. pectoralis major, latissimus dorsi muscles, and teres major), which act as humeral head depressors by means of the medio-inferior vector created by the orientation of their tendons. Recruitment of the glenohumeral adductors has been shown to decrease subacromial narrowing in elevated arms in asymptomatic individuals, and is thought to be a coping mechanism to decrease pain in individuals with rotator cuff tear. However, to the best of our knowledge, the efficacy of humeral head depressor muscle co-activation training on functional outcomes in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery after middle-size rotator cuff muscle tear has never been evaluated in patients with middle-size rotator cuff muscle tear. Since recruitment of those muscles could prevent a decrease in subacromial space during arm elevation, it could potentially lead to improved exercise performance, earlier benefits and better treatment outcomes compared to routine rotator cuff strengthening exercises. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of the humeral head depressor muscle co-activation training on functional outcomes in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery after middle-size rotator cuff muscle tear.

Detailed Description

Shoulder pain is one of the most common types of musculoskeletal pain syndroms in the general population as its prevalence has been estimated between 7% and 26% and its annual incidence between 0.9% and 2.5%. Rotator cuff tear is one of the most common causes of painful shoulders. Lack of coordination or weakness of scapulothoracic and scapulohumeral muscles is one of the main factors thought to lead to muscle tears in shoulder. More specifically, the inability of the scapular muscles to achieve superior rotation and posterior tilt, as well as the failure of rotator cuff muscles to counter the superior humeral head translation imposed by deltoid contraction can lead to impingement of the subacromial soft tissues while performing overhead dynamic tasks. This increases the rotator cuff tears' prevalance. Aside from rotator cuff muscles, opposition of superior humeral head translation can be achieved by the glenohumeral adductors (i.e. pectoralis major, latissimus dorsi muscles, and teres major), which act as humeral head depressors by means of the medio-inferior vector created by the orientation of their tendons. Recruitment of the glenohumeral adductors has been shown to decrease subacromial narrowing in elevated arms in asymptomatic individuals, and is thought to be a coping mechanism to decrease pain in individuals with rotator cuff tear. However, to the best of our knowledge, the efficacy of humeral head depressor muscle co-activation training on functional outcomes in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery after middle-size rotator cuff muscle tear has never been evaluated in patients with middle-size rotator cuff muscle tear. Since recruitment of those muscles could prevent a decrease in subacromial space during arm elevation, it could potentially lead to improved exercise performance, earlier benefits and better treatment outcomes compared to routine rotator cuff strengthening exercises. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of the humeral head depressor muscle co-activation training on functional outcomes in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery after middle-size rotator cuff muscle tear.

Study Timeline

• Status Verified: 2019-11
• Study First Submitted: 2019-11-05
• Study First Submitted QC: 2019-11-05
• Study First Posted: 2019-11-06
• Study Start: 2020-07-07
• Primary Completion: 2020-12-20
• Study Completion: 2021-01-20
• Last Update Submitted: 2021-02-01
• Last Update Posted: 2021-02-04

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 24

Inclusion Criteria

• the presence of middle-sized (1-3 cm) rotator cuff muscle rupture,
• undergoing arthroscopic repair surgery,
• volunteering to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

• presence of diabetic mellitus,
• stage 3 and above according to Goutallier classification,
• presence of any contraindication for mobilization (hypermobility, trauma, inflammation, etc.),
• visual, verbal, cognitive defects (aphasia, unilateral neglect, etc.),
• the presence of any neurological problem,
• the presence of cervical disc hernia.

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Control Group	Control Group	The American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Therapists' consensus statement on rehabilitation following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair will be used as guideline for rehabilitation of patients (Thigpen, C. A., Shaffer, M. A., Gaunt, B. W., Leggin, B. G., Williams, G. R., \& Wilcox III, R. B. (2016). The American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Therapists' consensus statement on rehabilitation following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 25(4), 521-535.).
Experimental Group	Humeral Head Depressor Muscle Co-Activation Training- Experimental Group	In addition to the conservative treatment of the control group, humeral head depressor muscle co-activation training will be applied for 14 weeks.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Visual Analogue Scale (Pain)	14 weeks	The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' and 'pain as bad as it could be'. The patient is asked to mark his pain level on the line between the two endpoints. The distance between 'no pain at all' and the mark then defines the subject's pain. The 11-point numeric scale ranges from '0' representing no pain to '10' representing pain as bad as you can imagine or worst pain imaginable. We use VAS to measure patient's perceived pain intensity during activity, at rest and at sleep during the last week preceding the assessment. MCIC for pain VAS is reported to be 2 points or 30%.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
The Constant-Murley Score	14 weeks	The Constant-Murley Score is the most widely used shoulder evaluating instrument in Europe despite its limitations. The 100-point scoring scale takes into account both subjective and objective measurements and is divided into four domains (pain: 15 points; activities of daily living: 20 points; range of motion: 40 points; strength: 25 points). Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for Constant-Murley Score is reported to be between 10.4 and 17 points.
Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC)	14 weeks	WORC is a disease specific self-reported instrument for rotator cuff disease. It consists 21 visual analogue scale (VAS) items in five domains: physical symptoms (six items), sports/recreation (four items), work (four items), lifestyle (four items) and emotions (three items). All items respect quality of life (QoL) aspects that can particularly be influenced by rotator cuff injury. Each item has a possible score from 0 to 100 (100 mm VAS), and these scores are added to give a total score from 0 to 2100. A score of 0 implies no reduction in QoL, and a score of 2100 is the worst score possible. The data can be converted to a percent score by inverting the raw score and then converting it to a score out of 100 (2100 'patient WORC raw score'/21). The domains are based on the WHO definition of health. WORC is determined to have the highest ratings among all shoulder instruments. The minimally clinically important change (MCIC) for WORC is reported to be 275 points or 12.8%.
DASH Score	14 weeks	The DASH questionnaire is a 30-item questionnaire that assesses upper extremity-related symptoms and measures functional status at the level of disability. The questionnaire consists of three sections: Symptoms; Sport and Music; and Work. The first section is composed of 30 items. The second and third sections are an optional module for Sport and Music, and four items for Work. Each item is scored with a 5-point scale: 1, no difficulty/symptoms; 2, mild difficulty/symptoms; 3, moderate difficulty/symptoms; 4, severe difficulty/symptoms; 5, extreme difficulty/symptoms (unable to do). The result of each module is summed and transformed to obtain the DASH score ranging, for each section, from 0 (best function) to 100 (severe disability).
Oxford Shoulder Score	14 weeks	Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), a 12-item scale rated on a five-point Likert scale from 0-4 (0=poor function, 4=good function). Daily pain and number of repetitions per exercise during home exercises were rated in the participants' diary.
Range of Motion	14 weeks	A universal goniometer will be used for measuring of range of motion (flexion, extension, elevation, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation).

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Kırşehir Ahi Evran University; 🇹🇷 Kırşehir, Turkey