A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Voriconazole + Micafungin Versus Voriconazole Alone for Invasive Aspergillosis
Phase 4
Withdrawn
- Conditions
- Aspergillosis/BloodAspergillosis/Invasive
- Registration Number
- NCT00423163
- Lead Sponsor
- Astellas Pharma Inc
- Brief Summary
To evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness of voriconazole + micafungin versus voriconazole alone as primary therapy for invasive aspergillosis.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- WITHDRAWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- Not specified
Inclusion Criteria
- Proven, probable or possible invasive aspergillosis
- Patient is 2 years of age or older
Exclusion Criteria
- The patient has been administered an antifungal agent (voriconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole, caspofungin, micafungin, anidulafungin, amphotericin B, or lipid formulation of amphotericin B) for >7 days immediately prior to randomization for treatment of the Possible, Probable, or Proven invasive aspergillosis for which the patient is being enrolled.
- The patient has been treated with voriconazole for > 7 days immediately prior to randomization
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The primary outcome will be Global Success (complete and partial response) at 6 weeks based on the combination of clinical, mycological and radiologic response.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Global Success (GS) at Wk 12, Favorable response (FR) & survival at Wks 6 & 12. GS and FR by infection site, overall frequency of emergent & recurrent fungal infections at Wks 6 & 12, duration of FR, and relationship of galactomannan to clinical outcome