THE EFFECT OF MESH TYPE (ULTRAPRO VERSUS PROLENE) ON POSTOPERATIVE PAIN AND WELL-BEING FOLLOWING TOTALLY EXTRAPERITONEAL (TEP) LAPAROSCOPIC HERNIA REPAIR: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.
Not yet recruiting
- Conditions
- (Endoscopic) hernia repair surgery/ (endoscopische) liesbreukchirurgieChronic pain/ Chronische pijnklachten
- Registration Number
- NL-OMON19969
- Lead Sponsor
- Diakonessenhuis Utrecht/ZeistThe Netherlands
- Brief Summary
/A
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Pending
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 950
Inclusion Criteria
1. Male patients;
2. ≥ 18 year old;
Exclusion Criteria
1. Bilateral hernia;
2. Scrotal hernia;
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What are the molecular mechanisms behind chronic postoperative pain after TEP hernia repair using Ultrapro and Prolene meshes?
How does the comparative effectiveness of Ultrapro versus Prolene mesh impact long-term outcomes in TEP hernia repair?
Which biomarkers correlate with postoperative pain severity in patients undergoing TEP hernia repair with synthetic meshes?
What adverse events are associated with Ultrapro and Prolene mesh implantation in laparoscopic hernia repair?
How do Ultrapro and Prolene mesh properties influence inflammatory responses and tissue integration post-TEP surgery?