Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03833492
NCT03833492CompletedNot Applicable

Efficacy and Safety of Underwater vs. Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for the Treatment of Diminutive Non-pedunculated Colorectal Polyps:A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial

Ningbo No. 1 Hospital3 sites in 1 country130 target enrollmentStarted: May 1, 2019Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
130
Locations
3
Primary Endpoint
complete resection rate

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This clinical trial is being conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of two standard methods of polypectomy,Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection(EMR)and Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection(UEMR),for small colorectal polyps.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients age between 18-75 years old with non-pedunculated colonic polyps (measuring between 4 and 9mm), who willing to participate in this study.

Exclusion Criteria

  • inflammatory bowel disease,
  • familial polyposis
  • the use of anticoagulant therapy or antiplatelet therapy
  • the absence of informed patient consent.
  • Polyps showing signs of deep submucosal invasion

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

complete resection rate

Time Frame: 7 days

complete resection rate is defined as a complete en bloc resection of a lesion with tumor-free lateral and vertical margins.

En bloc resection rate

Time Frame: immediately

En bloc resection rate was defined as the entire lesion could be removed in 1 piece instead of piecemeal resection.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Adverse event rate(14 days)
  • Procedure time(24 hours)

Investigators

Sponsor
Ningbo No. 1 Hospital
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (3)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials