MedPath

Increasing Uptake of EHR-enabled Population Health Outreach Strategies to Improve Diabetes Screening

Not Applicable
Conditions
Pre Diabetes
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Interventions
Behavioral: Parkland Diabetes Detection Program (PDDP) Screening Invitation
Registration Number
NCT05730582
Lead Sponsor
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Brief Summary

The study team's central hypothesis is that the Parkland Diabetes Detection Program (PDDP) screening invitations targeted by race/ethnicity with culturally concordant messaging and tailored by glycemic risk (known PDM vs. unknown glycemic state) plus phone-based navigation of non-responders will be more effective at closing screening gaps than PDDP generic screening invitations and usual care, opportunistic screening alone.

Detailed Description

The research team will conduct a pragmatic, split cluster randomized controlled trial (clinic=cluster; patient randomization) in 12 community-based primary care clinics in an integrated safety net health system serving a high-risk, racially/ethnically diverse population.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
500000
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patient is alive at time of data extraction
  • Age >= 18 at time of data extraction and <76
  • Visit with PCP at Parkland clinic in the last 18 months (548 days), where Encounter type = Virtual Visit or Encounter type = Office Visit
  • Patient NOT included in Parkland Diabetes Registry
  • Preferred language is Spanish or English
  • Ethnicity is Hispanic or Non-Hispanic
  • Race is White or Black
  • Patient is not pregnant in last 12 months

Exclusion Criteria for Study Population 1: Prediabetes Glycemic Risk Group

  • Last A1C value <5.7 (normal)
  • Last A1C value >6.4 (diabetes)
  • Last A1C value = blank (unchecked)
  • Last A1C date occurred within last 12 months from date of export

Exclusion Criteria for Study Population 2: Score-Based Glycemic Risk Group

  • Risk score <9
  • Last A1C date occurred in last 30 months from date of export
  • Last A1C value was >5.7 (PDM/DM)
Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Targeted-Tailored Screening InvitationParkland Diabetes Detection Program (PDDP) Screening InvitationPatients randomized to this study arm will receive the tailored letter, which uses messaging developed collaboratively by patients and clinical stakeholders under a prior NIH-funded research study (STU 2021-0743), in addition to available EHR data, to inform patients that they are at risk for Type 2 Diabetes based on specific clinical characteristics and that they are not up to date on screening. The letter also informs them that a screening test has been ordered, and requests that they fast and complete testing at their clinic lab within 60 days. Fasting instructions will specify nothing to eat or drink except water for at least 8 hours. The letter will be signed electronically by the patient's primary care provider and sent in both English and Spanish.
Generic Screening InvitationParkland Diabetes Detection Program (PDDP) Screening InvitationPatients randomized to this study arm will receive the generic letter to inform them that they are at risk for T2D and that they are not up to date on screening. The letter also informs them that a screening test has been ordered, and requests that they complete testing at their clinic lab. The letter is signed by the patient's primary care provider and sent in both English and Spanish. This letter was previously developed and has been in use by the Parkland Diabetes Detection Program.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Program effectiveness12 months

Program effectiveness will be assessed by comparing the proportion of patients completing HgA1c or Fasting Blood Glucose screening tests at Day 365 across intervention and control arms.

Cost effectiveness as measured by costs per patient screened12 months

Cost effectiveness will be assessed by comparing the costs per patient screened across study arms

Cost effectiveness as measured by cost per case found12 months

Cost effectiveness will be assessed by comparing the costs per case found across study arms

Invitation efficacy60 days

Invitation efficacy will be assessed by comparing the proportion of patients completing HgA1c or Fasting Blood Glucose screening tests at Day 60 in the targeted-tailored invitation intervention compared to the generic invitation intervention.

Direct costs12 months

Direct costs of diabetes screening compared across study arms

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Parkland Health

🇺🇸

Dallas, Texas, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath