Increasing Uptake of EHR-enabled Population Health Outreach Strategies to Improve Diabetes Screening
- Conditions
- Pre DiabetesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Interventions
- Behavioral: Parkland Diabetes Detection Program (PDDP) Screening Invitation
- Registration Number
- NCT05730582
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
- Brief Summary
The study team's central hypothesis is that the Parkland Diabetes Detection Program (PDDP) screening invitations targeted by race/ethnicity with culturally concordant messaging and tailored by glycemic risk (known PDM vs. unknown glycemic state) plus phone-based navigation of non-responders will be more effective at closing screening gaps than PDDP generic screening invitations and usual care, opportunistic screening alone.
- Detailed Description
The research team will conduct a pragmatic, split cluster randomized controlled trial (clinic=cluster; patient randomization) in 12 community-based primary care clinics in an integrated safety net health system serving a high-risk, racially/ethnically diverse population.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 500000
- Patient is alive at time of data extraction
- Age >= 18 at time of data extraction and <76
- Visit with PCP at Parkland clinic in the last 18 months (548 days), where Encounter type = Virtual Visit or Encounter type = Office Visit
- Patient NOT included in Parkland Diabetes Registry
- Preferred language is Spanish or English
- Ethnicity is Hispanic or Non-Hispanic
- Race is White or Black
- Patient is not pregnant in last 12 months
Exclusion Criteria for Study Population 1: Prediabetes Glycemic Risk Group
- Last A1C value <5.7 (normal)
- Last A1C value >6.4 (diabetes)
- Last A1C value = blank (unchecked)
- Last A1C date occurred within last 12 months from date of export
Exclusion Criteria for Study Population 2: Score-Based Glycemic Risk Group
- Risk score <9
- Last A1C date occurred in last 30 months from date of export
- Last A1C value was >5.7 (PDM/DM)
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Targeted-Tailored Screening Invitation Parkland Diabetes Detection Program (PDDP) Screening Invitation Patients randomized to this study arm will receive the tailored letter, which uses messaging developed collaboratively by patients and clinical stakeholders under a prior NIH-funded research study (STU 2021-0743), in addition to available EHR data, to inform patients that they are at risk for Type 2 Diabetes based on specific clinical characteristics and that they are not up to date on screening. The letter also informs them that a screening test has been ordered, and requests that they fast and complete testing at their clinic lab within 60 days. Fasting instructions will specify nothing to eat or drink except water for at least 8 hours. The letter will be signed electronically by the patient's primary care provider and sent in both English and Spanish. Generic Screening Invitation Parkland Diabetes Detection Program (PDDP) Screening Invitation Patients randomized to this study arm will receive the generic letter to inform them that they are at risk for T2D and that they are not up to date on screening. The letter also informs them that a screening test has been ordered, and requests that they complete testing at their clinic lab. The letter is signed by the patient's primary care provider and sent in both English and Spanish. This letter was previously developed and has been in use by the Parkland Diabetes Detection Program.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Program effectiveness 12 months Program effectiveness will be assessed by comparing the proportion of patients completing HgA1c or Fasting Blood Glucose screening tests at Day 365 across intervention and control arms.
Cost effectiveness as measured by costs per patient screened 12 months Cost effectiveness will be assessed by comparing the costs per patient screened across study arms
Cost effectiveness as measured by cost per case found 12 months Cost effectiveness will be assessed by comparing the costs per case found across study arms
Invitation efficacy 60 days Invitation efficacy will be assessed by comparing the proportion of patients completing HgA1c or Fasting Blood Glucose screening tests at Day 60 in the targeted-tailored invitation intervention compared to the generic invitation intervention.
Direct costs 12 months Direct costs of diabetes screening compared across study arms
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Parkland Health
🇺🇸Dallas, Texas, United States