Office Hysteroscopy Versus Cervical Probing for Cervical Stenosis
- Conditions
- Hysteroscopy
- Registration Number
- NCT03457350
- Lead Sponsor
- Woman's Health University Hospital, Egypt
- Brief Summary
This study aims to estimate if performing a small caliber office hysteroscopic cervical negotiation would succeed to bypass tight markedly stenotic cervix in comparison to blind cervical probing done under general anesthesia. Moreover, the investigators test the impact of drawing a detailed diagram after this procedure on the success of ET in participants with failed mock or actual trials of embryo transfer (ET).
- Detailed Description
It comprises 122 nulliprous women with failed cervical sounding on vaginal examination in the office. Participants were divided into 2 groups. Group A comprised 64 cases subjected to small-caliber office hysteroscopic cervical negotiation while 58 cases were subjected to cervical probing under general anesthesia. Main outcome measures included success to bypass primary cervical stenosis and complication rate
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 128
- Nulliprous women.
- Failed cervical sounding on vaginal examination in the office.
- Previous operation on the cervix.
- Use of any medication to prime the cervix (primary).
- Multiparity: weather delivered vaginally or by cesarean sectrion
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method How many cases of access to the endometrial cavity 20 minutes overcoming cervical stenosis
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method complication rate 20 minutes how many cases with perforation or false passage
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Woman's Health University Hospital
🇪🇬Assiut, Egypt
Woman's Health University Hospital🇪🇬Assiut, Egypt