MedPath

Innovative Application of Pressure Gradient Measurement in Internal Carotid Stenosis in Patients Undergoing CAS

Not Applicable
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Carotid Artery Stenting
Stroke
Carotid Artery Stenosis
Interventions
Procedure: CAS + Intravascular measuring the pressure gradient
Procedure: CAS (standard)
Diagnostic Test: Doppler ultrasonound of cephalic arteries
Radiation: Angio-CT of the neck and head
Other: Otolaryngological examination
Other: Psychological examination
Other: Neurological examination
Diagnostic Test: MR cerebral perfusion
Registration Number
NCT06123767
Lead Sponsor
4th Military Clinical Hospital with Polyclinic, Poland
Brief Summary

About 20% of stroke causes are atherosclerotic strokes caused by carotid artery stenosis.

In 2005, 92% of carotid artery interventions in the USA were performed in asymptomatic patients. It should be noted that screening in the general population for carotid artery disease is unwarranted, due to uncertain eligibility criteria for interventional treatment of asymptomatic patients. On the other hand, 10-15% of all patients with a first-ever stroke will experience an ischemic stroke as a result of previously untreated, asymptomatic, significant carotid artery stenosis.

Carotid artery angioplasty with stent placement (CAS) has become the second method of revascularization. ed, however, there is a great deal of ambiguity in the application of these criteria, which stems from the ratio of the risk to the possible benefit to the patient of performing the procedure, as well as the cost-effectiveness for health care systems.

OBJECTIVES The overall goal is (following the model of measuring fractional flow reserve - FFR) to try to establish a new parameter that could prove helpful in qualifying patients for percutaneous internal carotid artery angioplasty with stent implantation (CAS). Determining whether measuring the pressure gradient across the stenosis will determine which patients will benefit from the CAS procedure. In the absence of convincing evidence on the effects of CAS, especially for so-called asymptomatic patients, it is advisable to establish a parameter that would complement the eligibility criteria that, on the one hand, could prevent strokes in the population of patients with silent internal carotid artery stenosis and, on the other hand, avoid performing the procedure in the absence of benefit.

PRIMARY ENDPOINTS:

1. Assessment of cerebral perfusion by magnetic resonanse before and after CAS

2. Assessment of cognitive symptoms using before and after CAS

3. Assessment of neurological symptoms before and after CAS

4. Assessment of otolaryngological symptoms before and after CAS

SECONDARY ENDPOINTS:

Creation of a non-invasive computed tomography protocol with pressure gradient assessment in patients with carotid artery stenosis.

A final version of the algorithm based on a new diagnostic measurement (concentration gradient) ready to be used in the diagnosis of CAS-eligible patients with an implemented function for automatic classification of measurement results that will indicate the group of patients who will benefit from the CAS procedure.

Detailed Description

After qualification for the study (by a neurologist and vascular surgeon), patients meeting properly the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be referred for imaging studies with Doppler ultrasound, angio-CT scan of the arteries of the neck and head and cerebral perfusion in magnetic resonanse (assessment of the cerebral perfusion alterations using DSC (dynamic susceptibility contrast).

In addition, blood will be drawn and stored for subsequent testing. Afterwards, patients qualified for internal carotid artery angioplasty procedures will receive standard saturation treatment with two antiplatelet drugs (acetylsalicylic acid, clopidogrel) before the procedure, strictly according to the guidelines. The procedures are carried out with approved medical equipment (carotid stent, angioplasty balloon, peripheral neuroprotection). The selection of the appropriate equipment used for the procedure depends on the clinical situation, the experience of the operator and the anatomical conditions of the carotid arteries.

Measurements (invasive pressure in carotid artery) taken during the procedure before angioplasty (after insertion of the neuroprotection into the internal carotid artery) and after stent implantation:

COURSE OF THE STUDY

Baseline examination:

* Doppler ultrasound of the extracranial cephalic arteries

* initial qualification for CAS /neurologist, vascular surgeon/

* informed consent to participate in the study

* cardiological consultation (modification of risk factors)

* angio-CT of the neck and head

* assessment of the cerebral perfusion alterations using DSC (dynamic susceptibility contrast) MR perfusion

* additional neurological (with questionnaires), psychological (with questionnaires) and otolaryngological examination

* surgery (CAS) - Department of Vascular Surgery, Department of Cardiology

Measurements (invasive pressure) taken during the procedure before angioplasty (after insertion of the neuroprotection into the internal carotid artery) and after stent implantation:

* placement of a micro catheter to measure invasive pressure

* taking a measurement in the internal carotid artery above the stenosis (in the normal section of this artery)

* performing a measurement before the stenosis (in the normal segment of the common carotid artery at the level of the exit of the external carotid artery)

* reading the pressure gradient after obtaining a stable value (a minimum of 5 cardiac cycles)

* The study of intravascular pressure measurements will be performed using a special micro catheter of about 1mm in size (i.e., more than 2 times smaller than the delivery system for distal protection, which is the standard procedure, so the risk of complications is minimal). In the study protocol, the insertion of the catheter and measurement of pressures will be followed by the placement of a neuroprotection device in the distal carotid artery (standard of practice) to avoid possible complications.

Evaluation during treatment:

* angio-CT of the neck and head, 3 month after CAS

* assessment of the cerebral perfusion alterations using DSC (dynamic susceptibility contrast) MR perfusion, 3 month after CAS

* Doppler ultrasound of the extracranial cephalic arteries, 3 and 12 month after CAS

* Neurological (with questionnaires), psychological (with questionnaires) and otolaryngological examination betwenn 10-16 week after CAS

* Cardiological evaluation at 3, 6, 12 month after CAS (modification of risk factors)

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
200
Inclusion Criteria
  • Stenosis of the internal carotid artery in symptomatic patients: > 50%, (confirmed by non-invasive imaging studies: USG, angio-CT), qualified for angioplasty with stent implantation
  • Stenosis of the internal carotid artery in asymptomatic patients: >60%, (confirmed by non-invasive imaging studies: USG, angio-CT), qualified for angioplasty with stent implantation
  • Age of patients: > 18 years of age
  • Provided informed consent to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Inability to obtain informed consent to participate in the study.
  • Difficult anatomy of the aortic arch and the descending cephalic arteries (increased atherosclerotic lesions, acute angle of departure of the common carotid arteries, kinking of the internal carotid arteries).

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
CAS + Intravascular measuring the pressure gradientAngio-CT of the neck and headPatients with internal carotid stenosis qualified for angioplasty with stent implantation. Standard CAS procedure with additional intravascular pressure measurements
CAS + Intravascular measuring the pressure gradientPsychological examinationPatients with internal carotid stenosis qualified for angioplasty with stent implantation. Standard CAS procedure with additional intravascular pressure measurements
CAS (standard)Otolaryngological examinationPatients with internal carotid stenosis qualified for angioplasty with stent implantation. Standard CAS procedure.
CAS + Intravascular measuring the pressure gradientDoppler ultrasonound of cephalic arteriesPatients with internal carotid stenosis qualified for angioplasty with stent implantation. Standard CAS procedure with additional intravascular pressure measurements
CAS + Intravascular measuring the pressure gradientCAS + Intravascular measuring the pressure gradientPatients with internal carotid stenosis qualified for angioplasty with stent implantation. Standard CAS procedure with additional intravascular pressure measurements
CAS + Intravascular measuring the pressure gradientCAS (standard)Patients with internal carotid stenosis qualified for angioplasty with stent implantation. Standard CAS procedure with additional intravascular pressure measurements
CAS + Intravascular measuring the pressure gradientNeurological examinationPatients with internal carotid stenosis qualified for angioplasty with stent implantation. Standard CAS procedure with additional intravascular pressure measurements
CAS (standard)CAS (standard)Patients with internal carotid stenosis qualified for angioplasty with stent implantation. Standard CAS procedure.
CAS (standard)Doppler ultrasonound of cephalic arteriesPatients with internal carotid stenosis qualified for angioplasty with stent implantation. Standard CAS procedure.
CAS (standard)Angio-CT of the neck and headPatients with internal carotid stenosis qualified for angioplasty with stent implantation. Standard CAS procedure.
CAS + Intravascular measuring the pressure gradientOtolaryngological examinationPatients with internal carotid stenosis qualified for angioplasty with stent implantation. Standard CAS procedure with additional intravascular pressure measurements
CAS + Intravascular measuring the pressure gradientMR cerebral perfusionPatients with internal carotid stenosis qualified for angioplasty with stent implantation. Standard CAS procedure with additional intravascular pressure measurements
CAS (standard)Psychological examinationPatients with internal carotid stenosis qualified for angioplasty with stent implantation. Standard CAS procedure.
CAS (standard)Neurological examinationPatients with internal carotid stenosis qualified for angioplasty with stent implantation. Standard CAS procedure.
CAS (standard)MR cerebral perfusionPatients with internal carotid stenosis qualified for angioplasty with stent implantation. Standard CAS procedure.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Predictive capabilities of the obtained invasive pressure gradient in carotid artery stenosis on neurological status12 months

Composite endpoint including:

- changes in neurological status (assesed by the MMSE, mini-mental state examination; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale),

Predictive capabilities of the obtained invasive pressure gradient in carotid artery stenosis on changes in cerebral perfusion after surgery3 months

Composite endpoint including:

Assessment of the predictive capabilities of the obtained pressure gradient values

* on changes in cerebral perfusion after surgery (assessment of the cerebral perfusion alterations using DSC (dynamic susceptibility contrast) MR perfusion, before and after CAS

Predictive capabilities of the obtained invasive pressure gradient in carotid artery stenosis on MACEs after surgery12 months

Composite endpoint including:

- occurence of stroke/TIA or death

Predictive capabilities of the obtained invasive pressure gradient in carotid artery stenosis on mental status12 months

Composite endpoint including:

- changes in cognitive functions (assesed by the MOCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment - test)

Predictive capabilities of the obtained invasive pressure gradient in carotid artery stenosis on otolaryngological status in labyrinth functions12 months

Composite endpoint including:

- changes in labyrinth functions (assesed by the Skarzynski Tinnitus Scale)

Repeatability the diagnostic possibilities of non-invasive tests (Doppler ultrasound) in invasive pressure gradient values12 months

Composite endpoint including:

- comparison of the obtained invasive pressure gradient values with Doppler ultrasound (PSV, peak systolic velocity; EDV, end-diastolic velocity; estimated degree of stenosis)

Predictive capabilities of the obtained invasive pressure gradient in carotid artery stenosis on otolaryngological status in hearing functions12 months

Composite endpoint including:

- changes in hearing functions (assesed by the audiometry, tympanometry and ipsilateral middle ear reflex, otoemission, Skarzynski Tinnitus Scale, ABR - Auditory Brainstem Response, BERA)

Incidence of Treatment-Related Adverse Events [safety and tolerability] associated with the invasive intravascular pressure measurement procedure (1)12 months

Composite endpoint including:

- occurrence of periprocedural neurological event: TIA, stroke, death in patients who underwent CAS with the invasive intravascular pressure measurement procedure

Incidence of Treatment-Related Adverse Events [safety and tolerability] associated with the invasive intravascular pressure measurement procedure (2)12 months

Composite endpoint including:

- occurrence of another periprocedural complication: vascular spasm, perforation, cardiac arrhythmia, hypotonia/hypertension in patients who underwent CAS with the invasive intravascular pressure measurement procedure

Repeatability the diagnostic possibilities of non-invasive tests (CT angiogram) in invasive pressure gradient values12 months

Composite endpoint including:

- comparison of the obtained invasive pressure gradient values with angio-CT: degree of stenosis

Repeatability the diagnostic possibilities of non-invasive tests ("CT-FFR") in invasive pressure gradient values12 months

Composite endpoint including:

- comparison of the obtained invasive pressure gradient values with "CT-FFR" (planned creation of an algorithm based on test results: invasive pressure gradient, Doppler ultrasound, angio-CT)

Incidence of Treatment-Related Adverse Events [safety and tolerability] associated with the invasive intravascular pressure measurement procedure (3)12 months

Composite endpoint including:

- occurrence of new hypodense (impact) foci in the head CT scan after the procedure in patients who underwent CAS with the invasive intravascular pressure measurement procedure

Incidence of Treatment-Related Adverse Events [safety and tolerability] associated with the invasive intravascular pressure measurement procedure (4)12 months

Composite endpoint including:

- changes (improvement or deterioration) in brain perfusion (see point 1.) in the post-operative examination in patients who underwent CAS with the invasive intravascular pressure measurement procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Algorithm angio-CT/non invasive pressure measurement in carotid48 months

Creation a multiple regression model based on the data from non-invasive pre-procedural measurements on the incidence of unfavourable outcome measures.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

4th Military Hospital

🇵🇱

Wrocław, Dolnośląskie, Poland

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath