MedPath

Post-Market Study of Comprehensive Reverse Augmented Glenoid and Mini Humeral Tray in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Not Applicable
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder
Grossly Deficient Rotator Cuff
Rheumatoid Arthritis Without Humeral Metaphyseal Defects
Arthropathy of Shoulder Region
Post-Traumatic Arthritis
Interventions
Device: Comprehensive Reverse Porous Augmented Glenoid
Device: Comprehensive Mini Humeral Tray
Registration Number
NCT03726554
Lead Sponsor
Zimmer Biomet
Brief Summary

This study is a multicenter, prospective, non-randomized, non-controlled, dual cohort post market surveillance study. The primary objective of this study is to confirm the safety and performance of the Comprehensive Reverse Shoulder System when used with the Comprehensive Porous Augmented Glenoid Baseplate and/or Comprehensive Mini Humeral Tray in primary and revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Detailed Description

The Comprehensive Reverse Porous Augmented Glenoid Baseplate and Comprehensive Mini Humeral Tray belong to the Comprehensive Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty System. They were developed to provide patients with grossly deficient rotator cuffs with another surgical option. The aim of the Comprehensive Reverse Shoulder System is to increase shoulder function while reducing pain.

A maximum of 7 sites will contribute to this study. Enrollment of 7 sites on a global scale will allow for assessment of device consistency across different regions. Enrollment per site will not exceed 45 shoulders. 146 implants will be included in this study with competitive enrollment. All potential study subjects will be required to participate in the Informed Consent process.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
102
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patient must be 18 years of age or older.
  • Patient must be anatomically and structurally suited to receive the implants and possess a functional deltoid.
  • Patient must have a grossly deficient rotator cuff with severe arthropathy and/or a previously failed shoulder joint replacement with a grossly deficient rotator cuff.
  • Patient must be able and willing to complete the protocol required follow-up.
  • Patient must be able and willing to sign the Institutional Review Board/Ethics Committee approved informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patient is a prisoner.
  • Patient is a current alcohol or drug abuser.
  • Uncooperative patient or patient with neurologic disorders who is incapable or unwilling to follow directions.
  • Patient presents with osteoporosis.
  • Patient has a metabolic disorder that may impair bone formation.
  • Patient has osteomalacia.
  • Patient has distant foci of infections which may spread to the implant site.
  • Patient has rapid joint destruction, marked bone loss or bone resorption apparent on roentgenogram.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Comp. Rev. Porous Augmented GlenoidComprehensive Reverse Porous Augmented GlenoidSubjects with a grossly deficient rotator cuff in need of a reverse shoulder arthroplasty who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria and received the Comprehensive Reverse Porous Augmented Glenoid.
Comp. Rev. Mini Humeral TrayComprehensive Mini Humeral TraySubjects with a grossly deficient rotator cuff in need of a reverse shoulder arthroplasty who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria and received the Comprehensive Reverse Mini Humeral Tray
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Implant Survivorship10 years

Based on removal or intended removal of the device and determined using the Kaplan-Meier method

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Radiographic Performance10 years

X-rays will be evaluated for radiolucency, osteolysis, atrophy, hypertrophy, osteophytes, component migration, scapular notching and heterotopic ossification

Frequency and Incidence of Adverse Events10 years

Monitoring the frequency and incidence of adverse events, serious adverse events, adverse device effects, serious adverse device effects, and unanticipated serious adverse device effects as well as device deficiencies.

Clinical efficacy of the device is assessed using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon Score Patient Questionnaire.10 years

Pain, function, and activities of daily living are measured. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) scale is 0-100. 100 is the highest score and indicates the greatest function while 0 is the lowest score.

Trial Locations

Locations (6)

Andrews Research and Education Foundation

🇺🇸

Gulf Breeze, Florida, United States

William Beaumont Hospital

🇺🇸

Royal Oak, Michigan, United States

The Research Foundation for the State University of New York

🇺🇸

Buffalo, New York, United States

Campbell Foundation

🇺🇸

Germantown, Tennessee, United States

The Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

🇺🇸

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Norton Orthopedic Specialists

🇺🇸

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath