CoreValve Advance-II Study: Prospective International Post-market Study
- Conditions
- Aortic Valve StenosisValvular Heart Disease
- Registration Number
- NCT01624870
- Lead Sponsor
- Medtronic Bakken Research Center
- Brief Summary
The CoreValve ADVANCE-II Study is a best practices investigation of patients implanted with the Medtronic CoreValve bioprosthesis.
- Detailed Description
The purpose of the study was to investigate the rate of conduction disturbances after trans-catheter aortic valve implantation of the Medtronic CoreValve device, aiming to characterize best practices. The investigators did not assign study specific interventions to the subjects in the study.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 200
- Fulfilling the criteria of labeling indications of the CoreValve System;
- Patient is above the minimum age as required by local regulations to be participating in a clinical trial regardless of gender and race;
- Provided Signed Informed Consent or Data Release Form.
- Patients with a device regulating the heart rhythm by pacing (e.g. pacemaker, resynchronization device, implanted defibrillator);
- Patients with a pre-existing class I or class II indication for new pacemaker implantation according to the 2007 ESC guidelines;
- Persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation (except paroxysmal AF);
- Participation in another drug or device study that would jeopardize the appropriate analysis of endpoints of this study.
- High probability of non-adherence to the follow-up requirements (due to social, psychological or medical reasons)
- Pregnancy
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method New-onset Class I or II Indication for Permanent Pacemaker Implantation 30 days post procedure The Kaplan-Meier estimate of new-onset class I or II indication for permanent pacemaker implantation at 30 days for implant depth ≤6mm or \>6mm. Where class I is defined as evidence and/or general agreement that a given treatment or procedure is beneficial, useful, and effective and class II is defined as conflicting evidence and/or a divergence of opinion about the usefulness/efficacy of a given treatment or procedure according to the 2007 ESC guidelines.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Combined Safety Endpoint 30 days post procedure The Kaplan-Meier estimate of all-cause mortality, major stroke, life threatening (or disabling) bleeding, acute Kidney Injury - Stage 3 (including renal denervation therapy), peri-procedural myocardial infarction or repeat procedure for valve related dysfunction (surgical or interventional). A Kaplan Meier assessment was used to determine the composite rate.
Trial Locations
- Locations (9)
Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
🇩🇪Heidelberg, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Bonn
🇩🇪Bonn, Germany
Nemocnice Podlesi Trinec
🇨🇿Trinec, Czechia
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana
🇮🇹Pisa, Italy
Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen
🇧🇪Edegem, Belgium
Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam
🇳🇱Rotterdam, Netherlands
Istituto Clinico S. Ambrogio
🇮🇹Milan, Italy
Charite, Campus Mitte - Kardiologie Berlin
🇩🇪Berlin, Germany
Glenfield Hospital Leicester
🇬🇧Leicester, United Kingdom