MedPath

Comparison of Static Air Support Devices (Repose®) and Alternating-Pressure Devices in the Prevention of Pressure Ulcers

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Pressure Ulcer
Bed Sore
Pressure Injury
Pressure Sore
Interventions
Device: Repose®
Registration Number
NCT03597750
Lead Sponsor
University Ghent
Brief Summary

Maintaining and improving skin health are major goals in acute and long-term care. Patients at the extremes of age, the critically ill, medically compromised and those with immobility are at risk for developing several skin disorders, with pressure ulcers (PUs) as one of the most common and mostly preventable ones. Prevalence figures of PUs vary between 6.4% and 31.4%. PUs are described as localised injuries to the skin and/or underlying tissue, usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure or pressure combined with shear. Prevention of PUs is internationally seen to be a key quality indicator of care. To prevent PUs, reducing both the amount and the duration of pressure and shear at the pressure points of the body is strongly recommended. One of the interventions to achieving this, is the use of pressure-reducing devices (mattresses, cushions, etc.). Studies that compare the (cost-) effectiveness of different pressure-reducing devices are needed.

The primary aim of this study is to compare the (cost-) effectiveness of pressure ulcer prevention in high risk patients using static air support devices (Repose®) versus alternating-pressure devices. The second aim is to get insight in patients' experiences and perceptions of comfort using static air support devices and alternating-pressure devices. The third aim is to get insight in caretakers' perceptions of barriers and facilitators of the use of static air support devices and alternating-pressure devices and to reveal how these perceptions influence the readiness to use the products in clinical practice.

This randomized controlled trial will be performed in ca. 25 nursing homes in a random sample of 306 residents who are at high risk of developing pressure ulcers. Residents will be included in the study for a period of 14 days. Skin assessment and risk factor registration will be done on a daily basis by the nurses. Reliability checks and time measurements will be completed by the researcher.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
308
Inclusion Criteria
  • High risk of pressure ulcers (Braden score < 12) and/or pressure ulcer category 1
  • Currently using alternating-pressure devices
  • Bedbound (> 8 hours in bed) or chair bound (> 8 hours in chair)
  • Aged > 65 years
Exclusion Criteria
  • Pressure ulcer category 2,3,4, deep tissue injury (DTI) or unstageable pressure ulcer
  • Expected length of stay < 2 weeks
  • End of life care
  • Medical contraindication for use of static air support devices

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Static air support devices (Repose®)Repose®Alternating-pressure devices will be replaced by static air support devices (Repose®) during 14 days: * Repose® Mattress * Repose® Cushion * Repose® Wedge or Foot Protectors The frequency of repositioning remains unchanged.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Pressure ulcer incidence (Cat. II+)14 days

Development of at least 1 pressure ulcer Cat. II+ during study period

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Patient experiences and perceptions using a static air mattress14 days

Patients experiences and perceptions of comfort using static air support devices and alternating-pressure mattresses. Patient acceptability \[tolerance, (sleep) comfort, pain)

Cost of the intervention (Repose) versus the standard care (Alternating)14 days

Economic measures (from an organizational and patient perspective)

Incidence of incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD)14 days

Development of at least 1 IAD during study period

Caretakers perceptions of barriers and facilitators to use static air mattress14 days

Nurses acceptability \[barriers and facilitators\].

Trial Locations

Locations (25)

Woonzorgcentrum Meulenbroek

🇧🇪

Hamme, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Woonzorgcentrum Zonnetij

🇧🇪

Aartselaar, Antwerpen, Belgium

Woonzorgcentrum Zonnewende

🇧🇪

Aartselaar, Antwerpen, Belgium

Woonzorgcentrum De Mick

🇧🇪

Brasschaat, Antwerpen, Belgium

Woonzorgcentrum Egmont

🇧🇪

Zottegem, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Woonzorgcentrum Sint-Vincentius

🇧🇪

Avelgem, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Woonzorgcentrum Hallenhuis

🇧🇪

Brugge, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Woonzorgcentrum Ter Potterie

🇧🇪

Brugge, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Woonzorgcentrum Sint-Maria

🇧🇪

Brecht, Antwerpen, Belgium

Woonzorgcentrum Veilige Have

🇧🇪

Aalter, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Woonzorgcentrum Van Zuylen

🇧🇪

Brugge, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Woonzorgcentrum Sint-Jozef

🇧🇪

Kortrijk, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Woonzorgcentrum De Vijvers

🇧🇪

Gentbrugge, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Woonzorgcentrum Heilig Hart

🇧🇪

Oudenaarde, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Woonzorgcentrum Huize Zonnelied

🇧🇪

Ieper, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Woonzorgcentrum Sint-Camillus

🇧🇪

Wevelgem, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Woonzorgcentrum Minnewater

🇧🇪

Brugge, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Woonzorgcentrum De Pottelberg

🇧🇪

Kortrijk, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Woonzorgcentrum Wintershove

🇧🇪

Vlamertinge, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Woonzorgcentrum Maria Rustoord

🇧🇪

Ingelmunster, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Woonzorgcentrum Hof Ten Ijzer

🇧🇪

Reninge, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Woonzorgcentrum De Plataan

🇧🇪

Izegem, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Woonzorgcentrum OLV Gasthuis

🇧🇪

Poperinge, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Woonzorgcentrum Sint-Amand

🇧🇪

Zwevegem, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Woonzorgcentrum De Meers

🇧🇪

Waregem, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath