MedPath

Value of Bronchoalveolar Lavage with Acetylcysteine in the Treatment of Bronchiectasis.

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Bronchiectasis with Acute Exacerbation
Registration Number
NCT06726356
Lead Sponsor
First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University
Brief Summary

Bronchiectasis is a clinical syndrome characterised by chronic cough, profuse sputum and/or intermittent haemoptysis, with or without shortness of breath and respiratory failure of varying severity, and abnormal thickening and dilatation of the bronchial walls as seen on lung imaging. Nebulised inhalation of N-acetylcysteine has been shown to significantly improve symptoms, shorten the length of hospital stay, reduce the rate of re-hospitalisation within six months, and improve lung function in patients with bronchiectasis with a high degree of safety. There have been no studies on the efficacy and safety of bronchoscopic irrigation with N-acetylcysteine solution in the treatment of bronchiectasis. The aim of this study was to investigate whether bronchoscopic acetylcysteine lavage combined with conventional treatment is more beneficial to patients with bronchiectasis than conventional treatment combined with conventional bronchoalveolar lavage and conventional treatment without bronchoscopy, respectively.

Detailed Description

All patients enrolled were patients with acute exacerbation of bronchiectasis. A total of 180 patients (1:1:1 allocation) with acute exacerbation of bronchiectasis were to be enrolled. The patients were divided into control group A (conventional clinical treatment including anti-infective and expectorant therapy), control group B (bronchoalveolar lavage with saline on the basis of conventional clinical treatment, with a volume of 90 ml per target lung lobe, up to a maximum of 2 lobes, and a total volume of up to 180 ml), and experimental group C (bronchoalveolar lavage with acetylcysteine solution in combination with saline on the basis of conventional clinical treatment, with a volume of 90 ml per target lung lobe, up to a maximum of 2 lobes, and a total volume of up to 180 ml).

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
180
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Age ≥18 years and ≤80 years;
  2. Chest CT suggestive of bronchiectasis;
  3. meet the criteria for an acute exacerbation of bronchiectasis with symptoms such as cough, sputum, chest tightness or wheezing, and c. Patients who meet the criteria for an acute exacerbation of bronchiectasis with symptoms of cough, sputum, chest tightness or wheezing and who consent to bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage
  4. patients who agreed to participate in the study and signed an informed consent form;
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Severe cardiopulmonary diseases, coagulation disorders, poor tolerance to anaesthesia, psychiatric disorders or severe neuroses that are contraindications to bronchoscopy;
  2. Intraoperative findings of decreased SPO2 or inability to tolerate bronchoscopy or inability to tolerate further bronchoalveolar lavage;
  3. Inability to co-operate with the study for any reason or in the opinion of the investigator, inappropriate for inclusion in the study for other reasons;
  4. Bronchoscopy of patients with significant intra-airway haemorrhage who may be at risk of exacerbation due to bronchoalveolar lavage;
  5. Patients with acetylcysteine allergy;
  6. Missing information;

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Time of first and second acute exacerbationsix months

Description: Length of post-treatment time points to first acute exacerbation (days) and length of time points to second acute exacerbation (days) in all three groups of patients.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The change of mMRC scoresone month

The modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) of all patients followed up at different time points (day 0, day 3, day 7, one month after treatment). Categorised on a scale of 0 to 4, the higher the scale the more severe the symptoms are.

The change of CAT scores.one month

COPD assessment test (CAT) of all patients followed up at different time points (day 0, day 3, day 7, one month after treatment). A score of 0-10 is considered mild, 11-20 is considered moderate, 21-30 is considered severe, and 31-40 is considered very severe.

The change of LCQ scores.one month

Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) of all patients followed up at different time points (day 0, day 3, day 7, one month after treatment). Scores range from 3 to 21, with lower scores suggesting that cough has a greater impact on quality of life.

The change of SGQR scores.one month

St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) of all patients followed up at different time points (day 0, day 3, day 7, one month after treatment). The total score ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate poorer quality of life for the patient.

Number of acute exacerbationssix months

Number of acute exacerbations in the three groups at 6 months after treatment.

adverse effectsone month

Occurrence of post-treatment adverse effects (chest tightness, shortness of breath, worsening of respiratory failure, worsening of haemoptysis, complication of new pneumonia foci or signs of significant new infections considered to be related to lavage treatment) in the three groups of patients.

Re-treatment with bronchoalveolar lavagesix months

Hospitalisation for acute exacerbations requiring re-bronchoscopic lavage within 6 months in all three groups (re-bronchoscopic lavage may be considered for exacerbations after treatment: significant increase in sputum output, increase in the size of the lesion on CT).

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University

🇨🇳

Ningbo, Zhejiang, China

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath