跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06890195
NCT06890195尚未招募不适用

Effect of Dialysate Cooling Versus Sodium Profiling in Management of Intradialytic Hypotension Among Chronic Hemodialysis Patients

Assiut University0 个研究点目标入组 106 人开始时间: 2025年4月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
106
主要终点
number in IDH episodes

研究概览

简要总结

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a worldwide public health issue. Dialysis patients have a tenfold greater relative risk of cardiovascular death than the general population.

Dialysate cooling prevents intradialytic hypotension (IDH). This is achieved by inducing vasoconstriction and activating the sympathetic nervous and therefore improving hemodynamic stability .

Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is a common complication of HD. There is no consensus on the definition of IDH, but (IDH) is commonly defined as a drop in blood pressure during dialysis procedure and/ or hypotensive symptoms such as dizziness, weakness, nausea, cramps, blurred vision, and fatigue .

The pathophysiology of IDH is diverse. It could be the result of an inadequate cardiovascular response to the reduction in blood volume that occurs when the ultrafiltration volume is large . One process may involve an imbalance between a reduced effective circulating volume and the compensatory plasma refilling mechanism, wherein fluid from the interstitial and intracellular space is translocated into the intravascular compartment .

Cold dialysis reduces HD-induced brain damage by protecting the cerebral vascular beds from harmful perfusion . In the heart, long- term cold dialysis improved resting ejection fraction and reduced left ventricular mass and end-diastolic volumes while preserving aortic distensibility, decreasing the risk for future cardiovascular events

. Risk factors associated with IDH include old age, female gender, Hispanic ethnicity, long dialysis vintage, high intradialytic weight gain, high dialysis dose, anemia, diabetes, low pre-dialysis BP, high osmolarity, and high body mass index .

It can be applied universally and reduce the need for nursing involvement . Further, no additional cost is needed to conduct fixed reduction of dialysate temperature. While there are various methods of reducing dialysate temperature, optimal temperature or methods of temperature reduction to prevent IDH remain uncertain

To study the effect of dialysate cooling (0.5- 1 C lower than pre- dialysis core body temperature) Vs traditional sodium profiling on:

  1. Reduction the episodes of IDH .
  2. Net dry weight achievements.
  3. Post dialysis fatigue.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 70 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •• Patients age 18-70 years old.
  • •Maintained on HD for not less than 6 months
  • •Documented episodes of IDH

排除标准

  • •• Severly anemic patients (Hb<7 g/dl)
  • •Patients taking more than 3 antihypertensive (on days other than dialysis day).
  • •Patients with documented IHD.
  • •Patients on midodraine therapy prior dialysis session.
  • •patient refusal, incompliance or ineffective dialysis.

研究组 & 干预措施

Group A

Active Comparator

dialysate cooling group: patients will be subjected to individualized cool dialysate (dialysate temperature 0.5 °C lower than core body temperature)

干预措施: dialysate cooling (Procedure)

Group B

Placebo Comparator

sodium profiling group: patients will be subjected to standard dialysate temperature (dialysate temperature of 37 °C).

干预措施: standard dialysate temperature (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

number in IDH episodes

时间窗: 6 week

compare the total number in IDH episodes and Frequency of hypotensive symptoms between two group

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Mostafa Samir Abbas

Rsidant doctor

Assiut University

相似试验

Effect of Dialysate Cooling Versus Sodium Profiling... | 临床试验