Establishing of Next Genaration Sequencing Methods for Microbiological Diagnostic of Ascitic Fluid Infections
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 50
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- The comparative assessment of about 50 patients
研究概览
简要总结
Infection of the ascitic fluid is a serious complication associated with high morbidity and mortality. This fluid is often colonized with bacteria that can cause infection of the peritoneum and possibly sepsis. Many bacteria of the human intestinal microbiome can't be cultured by standard methods; therefore it seems likely that many of the relevant bacteria are not discovered in routine diagnostics, but may be relevant to pathogenesis. Culture-independent approaches such as NGS (Next generation Sequencing) have in principle made it possible to study or prove complex microbial colonization. Because NGS is a relatively new technology, microbiological diagnostic protocols need to be further customized and refined to integrate with the standard diagnostic workflow, if necessary. For microbiological diagnostics, material is collected from the appropriate ascites patients and sent for microbiological diagnostics. Afterwards the cultural diagnostics are carried out as part of the patient care at the university hospital. In this study the investigators plan to use these samples to analyze and compare the presence of bacteria by NGS in parallel to the culture diagnostics, and then compare it to the patients' gut microbiome, to understand the possible effect of the microbiome on ascites pathogenesis and outcome.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Other
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Male and female patients ≥ 18 years of age
- •Samples from patients who have ascites puncture to exclude infection
- •Written consent of the patient after clarification
排除标准
- •Minor patients
- •Non-consenting patients
- •Samples without sufficient residual material after standard diagnostics
- •Samples from patients who have not consented to the examination.
结局指标
主要结局
The comparative assessment of about 50 patients
时间窗: 12-18 Months
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Mohamed Tarek Badr
Principal Investigator
University Hospital Freiburg
