Operative Plate Fixation Versus Conservative Treatment for Acute, Displaced Fractures of Humeral Shaft
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Humeral Fractures
- Sponsor
- Peking University People's Hospital
- Enrollment
- 52
- Primary Endpoint
- Union rate
- Last Updated
- 8 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Conservative Treatment Versus Operative Plate Fixation for Acute, Displaced Fractures of the Distal Clavicle
Detailed Description
From Jane 2015 to October 2016, patients with displaced humeral shaft fractures are retrospectively included in this study, they were treated with either operative plate or conservative treatment. All the patients are regularly followed up in clinic. Then we will compare the union rate and clinical functional outcome(DASH score) between the 2 groups at 1 year after surgery.
Investigators
pengzhang
Department of orthopaedics and trauma
Peking University People's Hospital
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Men or women aged 18 to 65 years of age Completely displaced ,closed fracture of humeral shaft confirmed by radiograph Fractures within 1 month post injury Provision of informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
- •Pathological fractures Non-displaced (cortical contact) fractures Open fractures Presence of vascular or nerve injury Fractures more than 1 month post-injury Limited life expectancy due to significant medical co-morbidity Medical contraindication to surgery Inability to comply with rehabilitation or form completion Likely problems, in the judgement of the investigators, with maintaining follow-up (i.e. patients with no fixed address, patients not mentally competent to give consent, etc.)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Union rate
Time Frame: 1 year after surgery
Union rate of the fracture from X-ray
Secondary Outcomes
- Functional score(1 year after surgery)