Comparison of intra-ureteral placement versus conventional placement, with loop-tail ureteral stent, for stent-related quality of life and complications after ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a prospective randomized control trial
Phase 3
- Conditions
- rolithiasis
- Registration Number
- JPRN-UMIN000023497
- Lead Sponsor
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete: follow-up complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 80
Inclusion Criteria
Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
1.Patients with lower ureteral stone (U3) 2.Patients who had pre-stenying 3.Patients potentially requiring a ureteric stent for >14days postoperatively 4.Patients undergoing bilateral TUL 5.Patients with solitary kidney 6.Patients with difficulty of communication 7.Pregnant 8.patients who have been determined to be unsuitable as a subject by a physician
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change from baseline to each point in mean total score of Visual analog scale
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change from baseline to each point in mean sub-score of IPSS, OABSS, Visual analog scale, and SF36v2 Change from baseline to each point in mean total of SF-36v2 and IPSS and OABSS. Safety assessment Presence of hydronephrosis confirmed by ultrasonography after urethral catheter removal Migration of tip of suture (intra-ureteral placement group) or tip of stent (conventional placement group) into the ureter Presence of febrile urinary tract infection after urethral catheter removal Early spontaneous stent removal Retained stent Other stent-related symptoms